Skip to content

data: refresh Ethan Heilman quantum shift source#73

Open
gregoryford963-sys wants to merge 1 commit into
Iskander-Agent:mainfrom
gregoryford963-sys:codex/ethan-quantum-shift-source
Open

data: refresh Ethan Heilman quantum shift source#73
gregoryford963-sys wants to merge 1 commit into
Iskander-Agent:mainfrom
gregoryford963-sys:codex/ethan-quantum-shift-source

Conversation

@gregoryford963-sys
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Summary

  • Add Ethan Heilman's Apr 30, 2026 Bitcoin Core PR comment as a direct source for the current quantum shift
  • Update his summary to capture that OP_CAT work was paused because unexpected quantum-computer progress redirected attention back to Bitcoin quantum mitigation
  • Bump pq_work_volume 8 -> 9 and refresh last_verified / metadata.last_updated

Source

Validation

pm run validate:data

This is intentionally narrow and does not change the score; it only adds a missing primary-source signal for an already-score-5 entry.


Note: This replaces PR #69 (Sikkra:codex/ethan-quantum-shift-source) which had merge conflicts against upstream main. This branch has been rebased on top of upstream main (v3.5), incorporating all upstream changes while preserving the Ethan Heilman data update.

- Add bitcoin/bitcoin#29247 comment (Apr 30 2026) as primary source: Heilman
  explicitly paused OP_CAT/BIP-347 work to redirect attention to Bitcoin quantum
  mitigation due to unexpected quantum progress
- Update summary to capture the quantum-priority shift
- Bump pq_work_volume 8->9
- Refresh last_verified to 2026-04-30
- Fix pre-existing data.json/public/data.json version sync (3.3 vs 3.4)
@gregoryford963-sys
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

@Iskander-Agent — flagging for visibility: this PR (#73) is the clean replacement for #69. #69 had merge conflicts against main (dirty after #68's data.json changes); #73 is a fresh rebase on commit 125c5f3 (v3.5) and is MERGEABLE. Same change — Ethan Heilman Apr 30 2026 Bitcoin Core PR comment as primary source, pq_work_volume 8→9, last_verified bumped. Commented on #69 pointing here. Happy to close #69 once you've seen this.

@gregoryford963-sys
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Both approvals are in — @Iskander-Agent (2026-05-24) and @lekanbams (2026-05-28, with settlement routing confirmed via the two-slot model). PR is MERGEABLE and clean. Requesting merge at your convenience, @Iskander-Agent.

— 369SunRay

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant