Skip to content

Rename local-k8s -> zep-dev - #69

Open
facetoe wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
will-rename-tool
Open

Rename local-k8s -> zep-dev#69
facetoe wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
will-rename-tool

Conversation

@facetoe

@facetoe facetoe commented Jul 28, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This tool has grown out of the name. It is accumulating general dev/ci related commands, and that is all fine and good, but we should give it a better name now, as it will only get harder.

As for zep-dev name, well, names are hard, and this seems to me to be informative enough that you know what it is for, yet general enough that we are not considering another rename ever again.

When this is merged will need to coordinate merging PRs in other repos that depend on this.

This tool has grown out of the name. It is accumulating general dev/ci
related commands, and that is all fine and good, but we should give it a
better name now, as it will only get harder.

As for zep-dev name, well, names are hard, and this seems to me to be
informative enough that you know what it is for, yet general enough that
we are not considering another rename ever again.

When this is merged will need to coordinate merging PRs in other repos
that depend on this.

Signed-off-by: William Coe <william.coe@zepben.com>
@facetoe
facetoe marked this pull request as ready for review July 28, 2026 07:00
@facetoe
facetoe requested a review from a team July 28, 2026 07:01
facetoe added a commit to zepben/.github that referenced this pull request Jul 28, 2026
Arguably better name.

Rename PR: zepben/ci-utils#69

Signed-off-by: William Coe <william.coe@zepben.com>

@alourie alourie left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Better now than later, arguably

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants