WIP for 2027 - Time to Get Discussions going #3320
Open
arbessette wants to merge 7 commits into
Open
Conversation
arbessette
force-pushed
the
2027exp
branch
5 times, most recently
from
be203f1 to
88df58f
Compare
for all. I don't like pages that FRC comes before FTC, might be worth moving FTC to appear first. I had help from Claude, so wording may be wrong still. Draft open for discussion: we can keep all, parts, or none of it.
Collaborator
|
It looks great, but I'm worried about the maintainability of a bunch of raw HTML. I'm guessing it also doesn't translate. Have you seen how far you can get with the customization of sphinx-design? |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Major changes to homepage and getting started, trying to keep one page for all. I don't like pages that FRC comes before FTC, might be worth moving FTC to appear first. I had help from Claude, so wording may be wrong still.
Draft open for discussion: we can keep all, parts, or none of it.