brief: wire Context back-refs into 15 governed decisions (close doctor active-unwired)#131
Merged
Conversation
vu1n
force-pushed
the
brief/wire-decision-refs
branch
from
1826801 to
d4148a5
Compare
…r active-unwired) brief doctor flagged 15 active decisions as active-unwired: the backfill reconstructed the decision layer from code but never wired the // Context: back-refs. A code reader had no pointer from governed source to the decision that binds it. This adds each decision its own pinned back-ref (// Context: doc://pillbox/<id>@0001#<anchor>) in the most representative governed source file. These are comment-only, ref-only edits — the gate exempts them from needs-conformance (a pointer cannot violate a behavioral invariant), so no sign-offs are needed. Verified: brief check green, brief doctor 0 warnings / 1 info (workspace-cow-fork, an intentional draft), clippy (default + libkrun) + cargo check clean.
vu1n
force-pushed
the
brief/wire-decision-refs
branch
from
d4148a5 to
c69bacf
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What
brief doctor(the new advisory lint in the brief repo) flagged 15 active decisions asactive-unwired: the backfill reconstructed the decision layer from code but never wired the// Context:back-refs — in a couple of cases aconformssign-off was recorded without the ref actually landing (e.g.dx-zero-config-localclaimed anevents/log.rsref that points tosession-event-log-spine). A code reader had no pointer from governed source to the decision that binds it.This adds each decision its own pinned back-ref (
// Context: doc://pillbox/<id>@0001#<anchor>) in the most representative governed source file.Why it's a bigger diff than 15 lines
Adding a ref is itself a governed edit, so the touched files pull in
conformssign-offs for every active decision that globs them — 18 anchors total (15 wired + 3 collateral:substrate-plane-livesession,workspace-ingest-sovereignty,session-event-log-spine, which co-govern files the edits touch). All are comment-only; every invariant is untouched.Verification
brief check→ green (18 conforms satisfied)brief doctor→ 0 warnings / 1 info (the info isworkspace-cow-fork, an intentional unpublished draft)cargo check→ clean@0001(not@latest). The only@latestleft in the tree is the two CoW draft files, correct-by-exception (nothing to pin to until that decision is published).