Skip to content

docs: drop "active use case" from prereqs#65

Merged
saadqbal merged 1 commit intomasterfrom
docs/fix-prereq-use-case-64
May 7, 2026
Merged

docs: drop "active use case" from prereqs#65
saadqbal merged 1 commit intomasterfrom
docs/fix-prereq-use-case-64

Conversation

@saadqbal
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@saadqbal saadqbal commented May 6, 2026

Summary

  • Removes the misleading "with an active use case" wording from the prereq bullet in Readme.md.

A use case can only be created after data has been ingested — the platform needs the dataset's real schema and stats to define one. The prior wording sent newcomers to the web app to create a use case before they had a dataset, which is impossible. They'd get stuck before ever installing this package.

The full end-to-end quickstart that walks the corrected journey (sign up → install client → ingest → create use case → run experiments) belongs to #46 once its blockers (#44, #45, tracebloc/client#86) clear next sprint. This PR is just the one-line correction.

Closes #64

Test plan

  • Visual review of the updated Prerequisites section in Readme.md
  • Confirm no other doc/template still asserts a use case must exist before ingestion

🤖 Generated with Claude Code


Note

Low Risk
Low risk: documentation-only change that clarifies prerequisites without affecting runtime behavior.

Overview
Updates Readme.md prerequisites to remove the requirement that a tracebloc account have an active use case, leaving signup as the only account-related prerequisite.

Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit d547470. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.

A use case can only be created after data has been ingested, since
the platform needs the dataset's real schema and stats to define one.
The prior wording sent newcomers to the web app to create a use case
before they had a dataset, which is impossible.

Closes #64

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@saadqbal saadqbal merged commit d55f9bc into master May 7, 2026
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

docs: Readme prereq incorrectly lists 'active use case' as required before ingest

2 participants