Delete .github/workflows/claude-review.yml#2601
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
This PR removes the existing GitHub Actions workflow that ran automated Claude-based PR reviews, aligning with the stated goal of reducing noisy/over-frequent review automation while the workflow is iterated on.
Changes:
- Delete
.github/workflows/claude-review.ymlto stop triggering Claude Review on PR events. - Remove the associated concurrency/permissions/job configuration tied to that workflow.
mootz12
approved these changes
Jun 3, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What
Delete .github/workflows/claude-review.yml.
Why
It needs some iteration. Fires too frequently. It's noisy and too verbose. There's no way to silence it on long iterative PRs. And we should iterate on the pull request target usage as well.
In the interim we've enabled Codex review, which does not have many of these downsides by default.
The shared claude-review workflow we can keep iterating on, and test it on one repo before bringing it to a bunch and creating too much noise: