Improve PyMuPDF4LLM OCR pipeline and benchmark results - #86
Open
hashiromer wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
hashiromer
force-pushed
the
pymupdf4llm-rapidtess
branch
from
July 28, 2026 03:49
0a1e33e to
0c922ef
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Improves the existing
pymupdf4llm_markdownpipeline and enables layout and table evaluation.This PR also updates the pipeline documentation, dependency setup, tests, and leaderboard results. No additional PyMuPDF4LLM pipeline variants are added.
Benchmark Results
The full ParseBench run completed successfully:
Reproducing the Results
The submitted results were produced in the following environment:
Install Tesseract with English language data:
Install the pipeline dependencies:
Run the small test benchmark:
Run the full benchmark used to produce the submitted scores:
Validation