Skip to content

Replace deprecated spin_until_future_complete with spin_until_complete#306

Closed
hliberacki wants to merge 2 commits into
ros2:rollingfrom
hliberacki:hliberacki/spin_until
Closed

Replace deprecated spin_until_future_complete with spin_until_complete#306
hliberacki wants to merge 2 commits into
ros2:rollingfrom
hliberacki:hliberacki/spin_until

Conversation

@hliberacki

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Signed-off-by: Hubert Liberacki hliberacki@gmail.com

@hliberacki

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Due to change in RCLCPP - ros2/rclcpp#1874 Pull request

@fujitatomoya fujitatomoya left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can we avoid unnecessary changes to re-format?

@hliberacki

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

@fujitatomoya i will restore all formating base changes, they were due to some formatting plugin in IDE which did it implicitly (i did not check the diff good enough). it was not my intention

@jacobperron jacobperron left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

For context, this connects to ros2/rclpy#919

Comment thread launch_testing_ros/test/examples/set_param_launch_test.py Outdated
Comment thread launch_testing_ros/test/examples/set_param_launch_test.py Outdated
Signed-off-by: Hubert Liberacki <hliberacki@gmail.com>
@hliberacki hliberacki force-pushed the hliberacki/spin_until branch from 89c87b8 to d65ad3e Compare April 2, 2022 21:28

@hidmic hidmic left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM with passing CI!

@hidmic

hidmic commented Apr 4, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@ros-pull-request-builder retest this please

@hliberacki

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

LGTM with passing CI

Unfortunately, this CI will most probably fail. This is because it did not include all the related PRs and there will be a missing include issue. Here is a CI run for all my changes in each connected PRs.

ros2/rclcpp#1874 (comment)

@hidmic

hidmic commented Apr 4, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@hliberacki thanks for the heads up.

Indeed, CI will fail w/o ros2/rclpy#919.

@wjwwood

wjwwood commented Jun 24, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Since this is part of rclpy changes, it's blocked on ros2/rclpy#919 (review), but is not needed to fix CI after ros2/rclcpp#1874 was merged prematurely.

@christophebedard

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I've opened #396 to replace this PR.

@christophebedard

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

This can be closed, see #396 (comment)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants