feat(list): --full emits description/tags/fields in JSON for bulk queries (REQ-211, #506)

[avrabe]

Problem (#506)

AGENTS.md / CLAUDE.md direct agents to rivet list --format json for "machine-readable artifact queries", but that output is summary-only — id/type/title/status/links across all 917 artifacts. It drops description, tags, and fields, so a bulk query for a field value (e.g. priority, or the acceptance text) needed either one rivet get <ID> subprocess per artifact or a raw YAML parse.

Change

Add an opt-in --full flag to rivet list. With --format json, each entry also carries description (string), tags (array), and fields (object) — matching rivet get <ID> --format json, but in bulk.

$ rivet list --format json --full --filter '(= id "REQ-210")' | jq '.artifacts[0] | keys'
[ "description", "fields", "id", "links", "status", "tags", "title", "type" ]

• Additive / opt-in. Default output is unchanged; list-output.schema.json is additionalProperties: true, so no existing consumer breaks.
• Inserted before the --variant block, so a variant's merged fields: view still wins when both flags are set.

Bonus: schema drift fix

schemas/json/list-output.schema.json still typed links as {"type":"integer"} ("Number of outgoing links"), but the actual output has been an array of {type,target} objects since #358. The schema now matches reality and documents the new optional --full keys.

Verification (REQ-211 acceptance)

• list --format json --full adds the rich keys; plain list stays summary-only; --full's fields for an id equals get's fields (asserted in the new list_json_full_includes_rich_fields test).
• cargo test -p rivet-cli --test cli_commands — 128 passed, 0 failed (full suite).
• cargo fmt --check + cargo clippy -p rivet-cli --all-targets -- -D warnings — exit 0.
• rivet validate — PASS.

REQ-211 filed + flipped implemented in the same commit (repo convention).

Closes #506.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

[github-actions]

📐 Rivet artifact delta

Change	Count
Added	1
Removed	0
Modified	0
Downstream impacted (depth ≤ 5)	0

Graph

graph LR
  REQ_211["REQ-211"]:::added
  classDef added fill:#d4edda,stroke:#28a745,color:#155724
  classDef removed fill:#f8d7da,stroke:#dc3545,color:#721c24
  classDef modified fill:#fff3cd,stroke:#ffc107,color:#856404
  classDef overflow fill:#e2e3e5,stroke:#6c757d,color:#495057,stroke-dasharray: 3 3

Loading

Added

• REQ-211

📎 Full HTML dashboard attached as workflow artifact rivet-delta-pr-507 — download from the workflow run.

_{Posted by rivet-delta workflow. The graph shows only changed artifacts; open the HTML dashboard (above) for full context.}

[github-actions]

⚠️ Performance Alert ⚠️

Possible performance regression was detected for benchmark 'Rivet Criterion Benchmarks'.
Benchmark result of this commit is worse than the previous benchmark result exceeding threshold 1.20.

Benchmark suite	Current: 7628f7e	Previous: ecb073a	Ratio
store_lookup/1000	23338 ns/iter (± 33)	19344 ns/iter (± 32)	1.21
validate/1000	18042012 ns/iter (± 184268)	14088386 ns/iter (± 242969)	1.28
validate/10000	1433558689 ns/iter (± 19174588)	949773803 ns/iter (± 6493087)	1.51
diff/100	63385 ns/iter (± 277)	52775 ns/iter (± 999)	1.20
diff/1000	725809 ns/iter (± 2227)	601429 ns/iter (± 2712)	1.21
query/100	1189 ns/iter (± 10)	884 ns/iter (± 4)	1.35
query/1000	14833 ns/iter (± 189)	11248 ns/iter (± 15)	1.32

This comment was automatically generated by workflow using github-action-benchmark.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.

📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know!