Skip to content

[Pushers N03]Variables Initialized With Their Default Values#70

Merged
pepebndc merged 1 commit intomainfrom
fix/pushers-N03
Feb 11, 2026
Merged

[Pushers N03]Variables Initialized With Their Default Values#70
pepebndc merged 1 commit intomainfrom
fix/pushers-N03

Conversation

@pepebndc
Copy link
Collaborator

@pepebndc pepebndc commented Feb 10, 2026

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Style
    • Code optimizations in block hash smart contracts for consistency with current Solidity standards.

No changes to functionality or external interfaces.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 10, 2026

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Two Solidity contract files updated with simplified for-loop initialization syntax, replacing explicit uint256 i = 0 with implicit uint256 i. No functional or control flow changes; purely a syntax style optimization.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Loop Initialization Syntax Updates
src/contracts/block-hash-pusher/BaseBuffer.sol, src/contracts/block-hash-pusher/BlockHashArrayBuilder.sol
Changed explicit loop counter initialization to implicit style in for-loop declarations. Both loops in _receiveHashes and batch iteration logic now use simplified initialization syntax without affecting iteration behavior.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

Poem

🐰 Loop counters dancing, implicit and free,
No more zeros declared, they're born naturally,
Solidity syntax, now sleek and so clean,
The simplest refactor we've ever seen!
hops away satisfied

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3
✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title accurately describes the main change: removing explicit initialization of loop counters to their default values (0) in two Solidity files, which is a gas optimization pattern.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch fix/pushers-N03

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link
Collaborator

@luiz-lvj luiz-lvj left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@pepebndc pepebndc merged commit 9c65eae into main Feb 11, 2026
3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants