Merged
Conversation
S-S-T
approved these changes
Mar 23, 2026
Contributor
S-S-T
left a comment
S-S-T
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pulled/built and ran branch; and confirmed it's working as intended. Code edits look good; csv class correctly handles multiple form instances per observation, attachments, and locations.
RyCarpenter
approved these changes
Mar 24, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR fixes an issue where the CSV event export did not account for duplicate forms by adding separate columns with numbers differentiating the forms.
Testing Instructions: