Update README.md - #24
Conversation
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughChangesNuGuard catalogue
Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes Suggested reviewers: 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
✅ Passed checks (4 passed)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In `@README.md`:
- Around line 177-180: Update the NuGuard entry in the README to qualify that
red-team testing applies when a target is running and that remediation output is
best-effort, avoiding wording that implies every scan performs red-teaming or
guarantees fixes.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
| - [NuGuard](https://github.com/NuGuardAI/nuguard) - Open-source toolkit that | ||
| builds an AI-SBOM from agent codebases, then red-teams tool use, MCP | ||
| integrations, and API surfaces for prompt injection and data exfiltration, | ||
| with automated remediation output. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🎯 Functional Correctness | 🟡 Minor | ⚡ Quick win
Qualify the runtime and remediation claims.
The entry presents red-teaming and remediation as unconditional capabilities. NuGuard documentation states that red-team tests require a running target and that remediation is best-effort. Use wording that does not imply that every scan performs these steps or that NuGuard applies guaranteed fixes. (github.com)
Suggested wording
-- Open-source toolkit that builds an AI-SBOM from agent codebases, then red-teams tool use, MCP integrations, and API surfaces for prompt injection and data exfiltration, with automated remediation output.
+- Open-source toolkit that can build an AI-SBOM from agent codebases and, when configured with a live target, red-team tool use, MCP integrations, and API surfaces for prompt injection and data exfiltration, with best-effort remediation suggestions.📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| - [NuGuard](https://github.com/NuGuardAI/nuguard) - Open-source toolkit that | |
| builds an AI-SBOM from agent codebases, then red-teams tool use, MCP | |
| integrations, and API surfaces for prompt injection and data exfiltration, | |
| with automated remediation output. | |
| - [NuGuard](https://github.com/NuGuardAI/nuguard) - Open-source toolkit that | |
| can build an AI-SBOM from agent codebases and, when configured with a live | |
| target, red-team tool use, MCP integrations, and API surfaces for prompt | |
| injection and data exfiltration, with best-effort remediation suggestions. |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
In `@README.md` around lines 177 - 180, Update the NuGuard entry in the README to
qualify that red-team testing applies when a target is running and that
remediation output is best-effort, avoiding wording that implies every scan
performs red-teaming or guarantees fixes.
Contribution Type
Evidence And Scope
Review Focus
Please review for:
Checklist
Note
Add NuGuard entry to README under 'Tool Use, MCP, and Runtime Security'
Adds a bullet for NuGuard in README.md with a link and description covering AI-SBOM generation, red-teaming of tool use/MCP integrations/APIs, and automated remediation. Also removes a stray
-line after the section header.Macroscope summarized 7e85647.
Summary by CodeRabbit