Conversation
ianardee
changed the title
ianardee
changed the title
ianardee
force-pushed
the
utilities
branch
3 times, most recently
from
da3b846 to
7093d27
Compare
ianardee
force-pushed
the
utilities
branch
6 times, most recently
from
3deefaa to
686970f
Compare
sebastianMindee
left a comment
sebastianMindee
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Can we get rid of the nasty warning in smoke tests?
Note: Annotation processing is enabled because one or more processors were found
on the class path. A future release of javac may disable annotation processing
unless at least one processor is specified by name (-processor), or a search
path is specified (--processor-path, --processor-module-path), or annotation
processing is enabled explicitly (-proc:only, -proc:full).
Use -Xlint:-options to suppress this message.
Use -proc:none to disable annotation processing.
This one^
| if (pollingOptions.getMaxRetries() < 2) { | ||
| throw new IllegalArgumentException("Max retries must be ≥ 2"); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I don't see any reason to prevent 1 as a value here?
|
|
||
| // Send for processing | ||
| InferenceResponse response = mindeeClient.enqueueAndGetInference( | ||
| InferenceResponse response = mindeeClient.enqueueAndGetResult( |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Can you implement an ExtractionResponse and ExtractionParameters wrapper for this class like I did for Ruby, please?
2 participants
Description
Add support for all utility type models.
Types of changes