Complete remaining Python binding object support - #165
Draft
adrianweidig wants to merge 2 commits into
Draft
Conversation
Member
|
Thanks for the proposed changes. Note that there are many competing priorities on my plate at the moment, will take a closer look as soon as time permits. |
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #165 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 29.20% 29.22% +0.02%
==========================================
Files 64 64
Lines 20854 20791 -63
Branches 5037 5037
==========================================
- Hits 6090 6076 -14
+ Misses 12818 12769 -49
Partials 1946 1946 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Complete the remaining Python object-model work tracked in #2:
record_entry.name_to_id_map_entryas a typed Python object with type, numeric/string name, and GUID accessorsrecord_entry.multi_valueas a typed Python object with raw, typed, integer, datetime, string, binary-data, and GUID accessorsmessage_storetype fromfile.message_storetasktype for task and task-request itemsrecipientsplaceholder with recipient count, indexed lookup, and sequence accessContext
#164 was closed as a duplicate because the Python bindings are not considered ready. The maintainer pointed to #2, whose remaining unchecked items are the scope of this change. This PR intentionally does not alter the PyPI publishing workflow; it addresses the stated binding-readiness prerequisite instead.
Verification
python -m compileall -q testsgit diff --check(withcr-at-eolfor the repository's CRLF.vcproj)The PR is a draft until the upstream native/wheel checks have completed.