IDEMPIERE-7045 Implement OSGi component support for WEditor.DynamicDi…#28
Conversation
|
Warning Review limit reached
More reviews will be available in 2 minutes and 56 seconds. Learn how PR review limits work. Your organization has used up its prepaid credits, and credit purchases are no longer available. Enable the review add-on in the billing tab to keep reviews running — you're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file). ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based credits. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability. For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window. Please see our Fair Usage Limits Policy for further information. ℹ️ Review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: defaults Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughAdds a new documentation page describing the WEditor Dynamic Display OSGI service, its usage requirements, and a Java ChangesWEditor Dynamic Display Documentation
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In `@docs/new-features/v13/weditor-dynamic-display-service.md`:
- Around line 2-5: The page metadata and overview text contain awkward grammar
and repetition, so rewrite the frontmatter and introductory wording in
weditor-dynamic-display-service.md to read naturally and consistently. Update
the title/description/overview around the WEditorDynamicDisplayListener service
so phrases like “expose” and “implement … that implement” are corrected, and
keep the language polished in the opening section and related summary text.
- Around line 31-34: The example in the component annotation uses a hard-coded
AD_Field_UU, which makes the documentation specific to one field and easy to
copy incorrectly. Update the annotation in WEditor.DynamicDisplayListener
example to use a placeholder or clearly mark the UUID as something the reader
must replace, so the snippet stays generic and safer to reuse.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: defaults
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: 06c40cb7-e1d9-4dbf-97de-3dd41790c9fa
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
docs/new-features/v13/weditor-dynamic-display-service.md
| @Component( | ||
| property = {"AD_Field_UU=374eb2f5-41b6-45e4-8032-877d6f401c93"}, | ||
| service = WEditor.DynamicDisplayListener.class, | ||
| immediate = true |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🎯 Functional Correctness | 🟡 Minor | ⚡ Quick win
Replace the hard-coded UUID with a placeholder.
Copying this example as-is will only work for one specific field UUID. Using a placeholder (or explicitly saying it must be replaced) makes the example safer and clearer.
♻️ Suggested example tweak
`@Component`(
- property = {"AD_Field_UU=374eb2f5-41b6-45e4-8032-877d6f401c93"},
+ property = {"AD_Field_UU=<target-field-uuid>"},
service = WEditor.DynamicDisplayListener.class,
immediate = true
)📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| @Component( | |
| property = {"AD_Field_UU=374eb2f5-41b6-45e4-8032-877d6f401c93"}, | |
| service = WEditor.DynamicDisplayListener.class, | |
| immediate = true | |
| `@Component`( | |
| property = {"AD_Field_UU=<target-field-uuid>"}, | |
| service = WEditor.DynamicDisplayListener.class, | |
| immediate = true |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
In `@docs/new-features/v13/weditor-dynamic-display-service.md` around lines 31 -
34, The example in the component annotation uses a hard-coded AD_Field_UU, which
makes the documentation specific to one field and easy to copy incorrectly.
Update the annotation in WEditor.DynamicDisplayListener example to use a
placeholder or clearly mark the UUID as something the reader must replace, so
the snippet stays generic and safer to reuse.
2 participants
…splayListener
Summary by CodeRabbit