Skip to content

Conversation

@XiNiHa
Copy link
Member

@XiNiHa XiNiHa commented Dec 11, 2025

Background

Currently, integration tests are directly invoking SuperTokens API for auth, instead of going through the API server. This makes the tests less realistic.

Description

  • Auth through the API server instead of the SuperTokens server

Checklist

  • Input validation
  • Output encoding
  • Authentication management
  • Session management
  • Access control
  • Cryptographic practices
  • Error handling and logging
  • Data protection
  • Communication security
  • System configuration
  • Database security
  • File management
  • Memory management
  • Testing

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @XiNiHa, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request refactors the authentication mechanism within integration tests to route through the API server, ensuring a more accurate simulation of real-world usage. This change improves the fidelity of the test suite by mirroring the actual application's authentication flow. Additionally, it introduces a practical enhancement by exempting local IP addresses from authentication rate limiting, which streamlines development and testing processes by preventing unnecessary rate limit triggers.

Highlights

  • Integration Test Authentication: Integration tests now authenticate through the API server instead of directly invoking the SuperTokens API, making tests more realistic.
  • Rate Limit Bypass: A bypass for the authentication rate limit has been implemented for local IP addresses (127.0.0.1, ::1) to prevent issues during local development and CI.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Dec 11, 2025

🚀 Snapshot Release (alpha)

The latest changes of this PR are available as alpha on npm (based on the declared changesets):

Package Version Info
hive 8.13.0-alpha-20251211203628-a0b2b5793c2954d6837745be47138d0f0f03cbc3 npm ↗︎ unpkg ↗︎
hive-apollo-router-plugin 2.3.5-alpha-20251211203628-a0b2b5793c2954d6837745be47138d0f0f03cbc3 npm ↗︎ unpkg ↗︎
hive-console-sdk-rs 0.2.2-alpha-20251211203628-a0b2b5793c2954d6837745be47138d0f0f03cbc3 npm ↗︎ unpkg ↗︎

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

The pull request successfully refactors the authentication flow within the integration tests to use the API server endpoint instead of directly interacting with the SuperTokens API. This significantly improves the realism and accuracy of the tests. The changes also correctly update the authentication function's return types and propagate these changes throughout the test suite. Additionally, the inclusion of a rate limit bypass for local IPs in the SuperTokens configuration is a practical improvement for test stability.

): Promise<{ accessToken: string; refreshToken: string }>;
export async function authenticate(
email: string | string,
oidcIntegrationId?: string,
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

The type annotation string | string for the email parameter is redundant. It can be simplified to just string for better code clarity and conciseness.

Suggested change
oidcIntegrationId?: string,
email: string,

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Dec 11, 2025

📚 Storybook Deployment

The latest changes are available as preview in: https://pr-7409.hive-storybook.pages.dev

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Dec 11, 2025

💻 Website Preview

The latest changes are available as preview in: https://pr-7409.hive-landing-page.pages.dev

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Dec 11, 2025

🐋 This PR was built and pushed to the following Docker images:

Targets: build

Platforms: linux/amd64

Image Tag: 570fe31df47d16caaae3cf535acefdd5c49e8cdc

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant