Skip to content

Conversation

@aaronbell
Copy link
Collaborator

@aaronbell aaronbell commented Feb 9, 2026

Listed as "Apache2" but is an OFL font.

Listed as "Apache" but is an OFL font
@aaronbell aaronbell added the I Small Fix bugs fixed but nothing added label Feb 9, 2026
@aaronbell aaronbell marked this pull request as ready for review February 9, 2026 14:06
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Feb 9, 2026

FontSpector report

fontspector version: 1.5.4

Check results

[7] ofl/robotomono
🔥 FAIL METADATA.pb: Check URL on copyright string is the same as in repository_url field. (googlefonts/metadata/consistent_repo_urls)
🔥 FAIL Tofu should not be shown in sample texts. (googlefonts/tofu)
  • 🔥 FAIL We detected support for the Aleut language because the font contained all the base exemplars for the language, but the font is missing the following codepoints needed to render the specimen 16 sample text (This suggests there's something wrong with the sample text):
  • ̂ (U+0302) [code: bad-sample-text]
🔥 FAIL Fonts have equal codepoint coverage? (googlefonts/family/equal_codepoint_coverage)
  • 🔥 FAIL Other fonts have codepoints not present in ofl/robotomono/RobotoMono-Italic[wght].ttf: U+2126, U+2206 [code: glyphset-diverges]
⚠️ WARN Check for codepoints not covered by METADATA subsets. (googlefonts/metadata/unreachable_subsetting)
  • ⚠️ WARN ofl/robotomono/RobotoMono-Italic[wght].ttf: The following codepoints supported by the font are not covered by any subsets defined in the font's metadata file, and will never be served. You can solve this by either manually adding additional subset declarations to METADATA.pb, or by editing the glyphset definitions.
  • U+02D8 BREVE: try adding one of: yi, canadian-aboriginal
  • U+02D9 DOT ABOVE: try adding one of: yi, canadian-aboriginal
  • U+02DB OGONEK: try adding one of: canadian-aboriginal, yi
  • U+1F4D GREEK CAPITAL LETTER OMICRON WITH DASIA AND OXIA: try adding greek-ext
  • U+2000 EN QUAD: try adding symbols2
  • U+2001 EM QUAD: try adding symbols2
  • U+2003 EM SPACE: try adding nushu
  • U+2004 THREE-PER-EM SPACE: try adding symbols2
  • U+2005 FOUR-PER-EM SPACE: try adding symbols2
    ... and 30 others

Or you can add the above codepoints to one of the subsets supported by the font: cyrillic, cyrillic-ext, greek, latin, latin-ext, menu, vietnamese [code: unreachable-subsetting]

  • ⚠️ WARN ofl/robotomono/RobotoMono[wght].ttf: The following codepoints supported by the font are not covered by any subsets defined in the font's metadata file, and will never be served. You can solve this by either manually adding additional subset declarations to METADATA.pb, or by editing the glyphset definitions.
  • U+02D8 BREVE: try adding one of: yi, canadian-aboriginal
  • U+02D9 DOT ABOVE: try adding one of: yi, canadian-aboriginal
  • U+02DB OGONEK: try adding one of: canadian-aboriginal, yi
  • U+1F4D GREEK CAPITAL LETTER OMICRON WITH DASIA AND OXIA: try adding greek-ext
  • U+2000 EN QUAD: try adding symbols2
  • U+2001 EM QUAD: try adding symbols2
  • U+2003 EM SPACE: try adding nushu
  • U+2004 THREE-PER-EM SPACE: try adding symbols2
  • U+2005 FOUR-PER-EM SPACE: try adding symbols2
    ... and 32 others

Or you can add the above codepoints to one of the subsets supported by the font: cyrillic, cyrillic-ext, greek, latin, latin-ext, menu, vietnamese [code: unreachable-subsetting]

ℹ️ INFO METADATA.pb subsets are correct? (googlefonts/metadata/subsets_correct)
  • ℹ️ INFO The subset 'latin-ext' is listed in production metadata, but only 0.16% of its glyphs are supported by this font file. We can't remove it, however, since that would cause a regression in production. [code: unsupported-production-subset]
ℹ️ INFO Check for presence of an ARTICLE.en_us.html file (googlefonts/description/has_article)
  • ℹ️ INFO This font doesn't have an ARTICLE.en_us.html file. [code: missing-article]
ℹ️ INFO Check axis ordering on the STAT table. (googlefonts/STAT/axis_order)
  • ℹ️ INFO None of the fonts lack a STAT table.

    And these are the most common STAT axis orderings:
    wght-ital: 2 [code: summary]

[26] ofl/robotomono/RobotoMono-Italic[wght].ttf
🔥 FAIL Checking correctness of monospaced metadata. (opentype/monospace)
🔥 FAIL Ensure the font supports case swapping for all its glyphs. (case_mapping)
  • 🔥 FAIL The following glyphs are missing case-swapping counterparts:
Glyph present in the font Missing case-swapping counterpart
U+0259: LATIN SMALL LETTER SCHWA U+018F: LATIN CAPITAL LETTER SCHWA
U+1F4D: GREEK CAPITAL LETTER OMICRON WITH DASIA AND OXIA U+1F45: GREEK SMALL LETTER OMICRON WITH DASIA AND OXIA
🔥 FAIL Font contains '.notdef' as its first glyph? (mandatory_glyphs)
  • 🔥 FAIL The '.notdef' glyph should contain a drawing, but it is blank. [code: notdef-is-blank]
🔥 FAIL Ensure small caps glyphs are available (missing_small_caps_glyphs)
  • 🔥 FAIL The following letters did not take part in smcp substitutions:
  • upsilon
  • theta
  • uni04AD
  • uni04B7
  • uni0453
  • uni04EF
  • uni0434
  • uni046D
  • uni049B
    ... and 239 others [code: missing-smcp-lowercase]
  • 🔥 FAIL The following letters did not take part in c2sc substitutions:
  • uni04FE
  • uni1EDE
  • uni1EC6
  • Etatonos
  • Dcroat
  • Mu
  • uni1EF0
  • uni0418
  • Tbar
    ... and 336 others [code: missing-c2sc-uppercase]
🔥 FAIL Shapes languages in all GF glyphsets. (googlefonts/glyphsets/shape_languages)
  • 🔥 FAIL Failed language shaping:
Message Languages
Mandatory orthography codepoints: * es_Latn (Spanish)
The following mark characters are missing from the font: ̈ * el_Grek (Greek)
Mandatory orthography codepoints: * ro_Latn (Romanian)
The following mark characters are missing from the font: ̧, ̆, ̦, ̂
Mandatory orthography codepoints: * lt_Latn (Lithuanian)
The following mark characters are missing from the font: ̨, ̌, ̇, ̄
Mandatory orthography codepoints: * fi_Latn (Finnish)
The following mark characters are missing from the font: ̈, ̊, ̌
Mandatory orthography codepoints: * cv_Cyrl (Chuvash)
The following mark characters are missing from the font: ̈, ̆, ̋ * cv_Cyrl (Chuvash)
Mandatory orthography codepoints: * is_Latn (Icelandic)
The following mark characters are missing from the font: ̈, ̨
Mandatory orthography codepoints: * nl_Latn (Dutch)
The following mark characters are missing from the font: ̈, ̂
Mandatory orthography codepoints: * mt_Latn (Maltese)
The following mark characters are missing from the font: ̂, ̇
Mandatory orthography codepoints: * tg_Cyrl (Tajik)
The following mark characters are missing from the font: ̆, ̈, ̄ * tg_Cyrl (Tajik)
Mandatory orthography codepoints: * lv_Latn (Latvian)
The following mark characters are missing from the font: ̄, ̧, ̌
Mandatory orthography codepoints: * fr_Latn (French)
The following mark characters are missing from the font: ̈, ̂, ̧
Mandatory orthography codepoints: * de_Latn (German)
The following base characters are missing from the font: ẞ
The following mark characters are missing from the font: ̈
Mandatory orthography codepoints: * bg_Cyrl (Bulgarian)
The following mark characters are missing from the font: ̆ * az_Cyrl (Azerbaijani (Cyrillic))
* ug_Cyrl (Uyghur (Cyrillic))
* az_Cyrl (Azerbaijani (Cyrillic))
* ug_Cyrl (Uyghur (Cyrillic))
* bg_Cyrl (Bulgarian)
Mandatory orthography codepoints: * vi_Latn (Vietnamese)
The following mark characters are missing from the font: ̂, ̆, ̛
Mandatory orthography codepoints: * be_Cyrl (Belarusian)
The following mark characters are missing from the font: ̈, ̆ * uz_Cyrl (Uzbek (Cyrillic))
* tk_Cyrl (Turkmen (Cyrillic))
* tt_Cyrl (Tatar)
* os_Cyrl (Ossetic)
* udm_Cyrl (Udmurt)
* myv_Cyrl (Erzya)
* dar_Cyrl (Dargwa)
* mdf_Cyrl (Moksha)
... and 17 others
Mandatory orthography codepoints: * ru_Cyrl (Russian)
The following mark characters are missing from the font: ̆, ̈ * uk_Cyrl (Ukrainian)
* kk_Cyrl (Kazakh)
* mn_Cyrl (Mongolian)
* ky_Cyrl (Kyrgyz)
* ba_Cyrl (Bashkir)
* kbd_Cyrl (Kabardian)
* ce_Cyrl (Chechen)
* av_Cyrl (Avaric)
... and 25 others
Mandatory orthography codepoints: * tr_Latn (Turkish)
The following mark characters are missing from the font: ̆, ̇, ̂, ̈, ̦, ̧
Mandatory orthography codepoints: * da_Latn (Danish)
The following mark characters are missing from the font: ̊
Mandatory orthography codepoints: * ca_Latn (Catalan)
The following mark characters are missing from the font: ̧, ̈ * sq_Latn (Albanian)
Mandatory orthography codepoints: * cu_Cyrl (Church Slavic)
The following base characters are missing from the font: ꙗ, ꙍ, Ꙗ, Ꙋ, ꙁ, Ꙃ, Ꙍ, ꙋ, ꙃ, Ꙁ
The following mark characters are missing from the font: ̈, ̆
Mandatory orthography codepoints: * hu_Latn (Hungarian)
The following mark characters are missing from the font: ̋, ̈
Mandatory orthography codepoints: * cy_Latn (Welsh)
The following mark characters are missing from the font: ̂, ̈ * it_Latn (Italian)
Mandatory orthography codepoints: * nb_Latn (Norwegian Bokmål)
The following mark characters are missing from the font: ̈, ̊, ̂
Mandatory orthography codepoints: * en_Latn (English)
The following mark characters are missing from the font: ̂, ̧, ̈ * pt_Latn (Portuguese)
Mandatory orthography codepoints: * hr_Latn (Croatian)
The following mark characters are missing from the font: ̌
Mandatory orthography codepoints: * sk_Latn (Slovak)
The following mark characters are missing from the font: ̂, ̌, ̈
Mandatory orthography codepoints: * cs_Latn (Czech)
The following mark characters are missing from the font: ̊, ̌
Mandatory orthography codepoints: * pl_Latn (Polish)
The following mark characters are missing from the font: ̨, ̇
Mandatory orthography codepoints: * sv_Latn (Swedish)
The following mark characters are missing from the font: ̊, ̈
  • ⚠️ WARN Warning language shaping:
Message Languages
Auxiliary orthography codepoints: * sr_Cyrl (Serbian)
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: а̂ * sr_Cyrl (Serbian)
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: е̂
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: и̂
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: о̂
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: у̂
Small caps for Latin letters: * sv_Latn (Swedish)
When shaping the text 'æ' and shaping the text 'æ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'ø' and shaping the text 'ø' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
Small caps for Latin letters: * ca_Latn (Catalan)
When shaping the text 'æ' and shaping the text 'æ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same * en_Latn (English)
When shaping the text 'ø' and shaping the text 'ø' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same * es_Latn (Spanish)
When shaping the text 'œ' and shaping the text 'œ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same * hu_Latn (Hungarian)
* it_Latn (Italian)
* pt_Latn (Portuguese)
* sk_Latn (Slovak)
Small caps for Latin letters: * cs_Latn (Czech)
When shaping the text 'æ' and shaping the text 'æ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'ł' and shaping the text 'ł' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'ø' and shaping the text 'ø' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'œ' and shaping the text 'œ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
Small caps for Latin letters: * tr_Latn (Turkish)
When shaping the text 'ı' and shaping the text 'ı' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'æ' and shaping the text 'æ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'ø' and shaping the text 'ø' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'œ' and shaping the text 'œ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
Small caps for Latin letters: * de_Latn (German)
When shaping the text 'æ' and shaping the text 'æ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'ı' and shaping the text 'ı' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'ø' and shaping the text 'ø' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'œ' and shaping the text 'œ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'ſ' and shaping the text 'ſ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
Small caps for Latin letters: * lt_Latn (Lithuanian)
When shaping the text 'ẽ' and shaping the text 'ẽ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
Small caps for Latin letters: * nl_Latn (Dutch)
When shaping the text 'æ' and shaping the text 'æ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'ij' and shaping the text 'ij' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'ø' and shaping the text 'ø' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'œ' and shaping the text 'œ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
Small caps for Latin letters: * nb_Latn (Norwegian Bokmål)
When shaping the text 'æ' and shaping the text 'æ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'ø' and shaping the text 'ø' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'ŋ' and shaping the text 'ŋ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
Auxiliary orthography codepoints: * el_Grek (Greek)
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: ἀ
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: ἄ
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: ἂ
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: ἆ
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: ἁ
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: ἅ
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: ἃ
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: ἇ
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: ὰ
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: ᾶ
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: ἐ
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: ἔ
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: ἒ
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: ἑ
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: ἕ
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: ἓ
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: ὲ
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: ἠ
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: ἤ
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: ἢ
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: ἦ
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: ἡ
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: ἥ
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: ἣ
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: ἧ
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: ὴ
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: ῆ
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: ἰ
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: ἴ
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: ἲ
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: ἶ
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: ἱ
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: ἵ
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: ἳ
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: ἷ
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: ὶ
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: ῖ
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: ῒ
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: ῗ
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: ὄ
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: ὂ
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: ὃ
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: ὸ
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: ὐ
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: ὔ
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: ὒ
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: ὖ
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: ὑ
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: ὕ
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: ὓ
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: ὗ
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: ὺ
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: ῦ
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: ῢ
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: ῧ
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: ὤ
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: ὢ
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: ὦ
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: ὥ
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: ὣ
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: ὧ
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: ὼ
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: ῶ
Small caps i should be dotted: * tr_Latn (Turkish)
When shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp and shaping the text 'i' in language 'tr' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
Auxiliary orthography codepoints: * en_Latn (English)
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: ʻ
Auxiliary orthography codepoints: * it_Latn (Italian)
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: ẞ * pl_Latn (Polish)
* tr_Latn (Turkish)
Small caps for Latin letters: * mt_Latn (Maltese)
When shaping the text 'ċ' and shaping the text 'ċ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'ġ' and shaping the text 'ġ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'ħ' and shaping the text 'ħ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
Auxiliary orthography codepoints: * nb_Latn (Norwegian Bokmål)
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: Ǎ
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: ǎ
Small caps for Latin letters: * ro_Latn (Romanian)
When shaping the text 'ș' and shaping the text 'ș' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'ț' and shaping the text 'ț' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
Small caps for Latin letters: * pl_Latn (Polish)
When shaping the text 'ł' and shaping the text 'ł' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'æ' and shaping the text 'æ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'œ' and shaping the text 'œ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
Small caps for Latin letters: * cy_Latn (Welsh)
When shaping the text 'ẃ' and shaping the text 'ẃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'ẁ' and shaping the text 'ẁ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'ẅ' and shaping the text 'ẅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'ỳ' and shaping the text 'ỳ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'æ' and shaping the text 'æ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'ø' and shaping the text 'ø' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'œ' and shaping the text 'œ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
Small caps for Latin letters: * fi_Latn (Finnish)
When shaping the text 'ċ' and shaping the text 'ċ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'ħ' and shaping the text 'ħ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'ı' and shaping the text 'ı' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'ł' and shaping the text 'ł' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'ŋ' and shaping the text 'ŋ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'œ' and shaping the text 'œ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'ș' and shaping the text 'ș' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'ț' and shaping the text 'ț' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'þ' and shaping the text 'þ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'æ' and shaping the text 'æ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'ø' and shaping the text 'ø' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
Small caps for Latin letters: * da_Latn (Danish)
When shaping the text 'æ' and shaping the text 'æ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'ø' and shaping the text 'ø' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'œ' and shaping the text 'œ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'ǿ' and shaping the text 'ǿ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
Small caps for Latin letters: * vi_Latn (Vietnamese)
When shaping the text 'ả' and shaping the text 'ả' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'ạ' and shaping the text 'ạ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'ằ' and shaping the text 'ằ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'ẳ' and shaping the text 'ẳ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'ẵ' and shaping the text 'ẵ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'ắ' and shaping the text 'ắ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'ặ' and shaping the text 'ặ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'ầ' and shaping the text 'ầ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'ẩ' and shaping the text 'ẩ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'ẫ' and shaping the text 'ẫ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'ấ' and shaping the text 'ấ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'ậ' and shaping the text 'ậ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'ẻ' and shaping the text 'ẻ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'ẽ' and shaping the text 'ẽ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'ẹ' and shaping the text 'ẹ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'ề' and shaping the text 'ề' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'ể' and shaping the text 'ể' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'ễ' and shaping the text 'ễ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'ế' and shaping the text 'ế' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'ệ' and shaping the text 'ệ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'ỉ' and shaping the text 'ỉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'ị' and shaping the text 'ị' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'ỏ' and shaping the text 'ỏ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'ọ' and shaping the text 'ọ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'ồ' and shaping the text 'ồ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'ổ' and shaping the text 'ổ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'ỗ' and shaping the text 'ỗ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'ố' and shaping the text 'ố' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'ộ' and shaping the text 'ộ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'ơ' and shaping the text 'ơ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'ờ' and shaping the text 'ờ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'ở' and shaping the text 'ở' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'ỡ' and shaping the text 'ỡ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'ớ' and shaping the text 'ớ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'ợ' and shaping the text 'ợ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'ủ' and shaping the text 'ủ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'ụ' and shaping the text 'ụ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'ư' and shaping the text 'ư' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'ừ' and shaping the text 'ừ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'ử' and shaping the text 'ử' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'ữ' and shaping the text 'ữ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'ứ' and shaping the text 'ứ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'ự' and shaping the text 'ự' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'ỳ' and shaping the text 'ỳ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'ỷ' and shaping the text 'ỷ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'ỹ' and shaping the text 'ỹ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'ỵ' and shaping the text 'ỵ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
Auxiliary orthography codepoints: * fi_Latn (Finnish)
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: Ǧ
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: Ǥ
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: Ȟ
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: Ǩ
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: ẞ
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: Ʒ
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: Ǯ
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: ǧ
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: ǥ
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: ȟ
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: ǩ
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: ʒ
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: ǯ
Small caps for Latin letters: * fr_Latn (French)
When shaping the text 'æ' and shaping the text 'æ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'œ' and shaping the text 'œ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'ø' and shaping the text 'ø' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'ſ' and shaping the text 'ſ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
Small caps for Latin letters: * is_Latn (Icelandic)
When shaping the text 'þ' and shaping the text 'þ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'æ' and shaping the text 'æ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
Auxiliary orthography codepoints: * lt_Latn (Lithuanian)
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: İ́
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: İ̀
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: İ̃
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: Į̇́
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: Į̇̃
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: J̇̃
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: i̇́
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: i̇̀
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: i̇̃
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: į̇́
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: į̇̃
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: j̇̃
Auxiliary orthography codepoints: * fr_Latn (French)
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: ẞ
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: Ǔ
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: ǔ
🔥 FAIL OS/2.fsSelection bit 7 (USE_TYPO_METRICS) is set in all fonts. (googlefonts/use_typo_metrics)
  • 🔥 FAIL OS/2.fsSelection bit 7 (USE_TYPO_METRICS) was NOT set. [code: missing-os2-fsselection-bit7]
🔥 FAIL Version number has increased since previous release on Google Fonts? (googlefonts/version_bump)
  • 🔥 FAIL Version number 3.001007 is equal to version on Google fonts [code: same-version]
⚠️ WARN Check accent of Lcaron, dcaron, lcaron, tcaron (alt_caron)
  • ⚠️ WARN Lcaron uses component: quoteright [code: bad-mark]

  • ⚠️ WARN dcaron uses component: quoteright [code: bad-mark]

  • ⚠️ WARN lcaron uses component: quoteright [code: bad-mark]

  • ⚠️ WARN tcaron uses component: quoteright [code: bad-mark]

⚠️ WARN Does GPOS table have kerning information? (gpos_kerning_info)
  • ⚠️ WARN GPOS table lacks kerning information. [code: lacks-kern-info]
⚠️ WARN Detect any interpolation issues in the font. (interpolation_issues)
  • ⚠️ WARN Glyph Aringacute has interpolation issues:
  • Wrong start point: contour 4 should start at 4 in wght=100
  • Contour 4 becomes underweight in wght=100 compared to default [code: glyph]
  • ⚠️ WARN Glyph aringacute has interpolation issues:
  • Wrong start point: contour 4 should start at 4 in wght=100
  • Contour 4 becomes underweight in wght=100 compared to default [code: glyph]
  • ⚠️ WARN Glyph ringacute has interpolation issues:
  • Wrong start point: contour 2 should start at 4 in wght=100
  • Contour 2 becomes underweight in wght=100 compared to default [code: glyph]
  • ⚠️ WARN Glyph Aringacute.smcp has interpolation issues:
  • Wrong start point: contour 4 should start at 4 in wght=100
  • Contour 4 becomes underweight in wght=100 compared to default [code: glyph]
⚠️ WARN Ensure indic fonts have the Indian Rupee Sign glyph. (rupee)
  • ⚠️ WARN Font is missing the Indian Rupee Sign glyph. Please add a glyph for Indian Rupee Sign (₹) at codepoint U+20B9. [code: missing-rupee]
⚠️ WARN Does the font contain a soft hyphen? (soft_hyphen)
  • ⚠️ WARN This font has a 'Soft Hyphen' character. [code: softhyphen]
⚠️ WARN Check font contains no unreachable glyphs (unreachable_glyphs)
  • ⚠️ WARN The following glyphs could not be reached by codepoint or substitution rules:
  • two.sup
  • one.sup
  • three.sup
  • four.sup
  • five.sup
  • seven.sup
  • eight.sup [code: unreachable-glyphs]
⚠️ WARN Glyph names are all valid? (valid_glyphnames)
  • ⚠️ WARN Glyph 0x00A0 is called nonbreakingspace; must be named 'uni00A0'. [code: not-recommended-00A0]
⚠️ WARN Ensure variable fonts have relatively consistent sidebearings. (suspicious_sidebearings)
  • ⚠️ WARN Glyph "uni0486" has suspiciously high variation (z-score 16.08) in right sidebearings at locations:
    wght=457.46
    wght=541.27
    wght=700.00 [code: large-rsb-variation]

  • ⚠️ WARN Glyph "uni0483" has suspiciously high variation (z-score 13.11) in right sidebearings at locations:
    wght=457.46
    wght=541.27
    wght=700.00 [code: large-rsb-variation]

  • ⚠️ WARN Glyph "uni0485" has suspiciously high variation (z-score 13.75) in right sidebearings at locations:
    wght=457.46
    wght=541.27
    wght=700.00 [code: large-rsb-variation]

  • ⚠️ WARN Glyph "uni0484" has suspiciously high variation (z-score 14.54) in right sidebearings at locations:
    wght=457.46
    wght=541.27
    wght=700.00 [code: large-rsb-variation]

  • ⚠️ WARN Glyph "uni030F" has suspiciously high variation (z-score 10.82) in right sidebearings at locations:
    wght=100.00
    wght=233.33
    wght=333.34 [code: large-rsb-variation]

⚠️ WARN Font has correct separator glyphs? (googlefonts/separator_glyphs)
  • ⚠️ WARN The following separator glyphs are missing:
  • U+2028
  • U+2029 [code: missing-separator-glyphs]
⚠️ WARN Ensure soft_dotted characters lose their dot when combined with marks that replace the dot. (soft_dotted)
  • ⚠️ WARN The dot of soft dotted characters used in orthographies must disappear in the following strings:
  • ị́

  • ị̀

  • ị̃

  • į́

  • į̀

  • į̃


  • ... and 1 othersThe dot of soft dotted characters should disappear in other cases, for example:

  • ị҄

  • ị҃

  • ị҅

  • ị҆

  • ị̉

  • ị̏

  • į҄

  • į҃

  • į҅
    ... and 31 others [code: soft-dotted]

⚠️ WARN Check the direction of the outermost contour in each glyph (outline_direction)
  • ⚠️ WARN The following glyphs have a counter-clockwise outer contour:
  • A (U+0041) has a counter-clockwise outer contour
  • B (U+0042) has a counter-clockwise outer contour
  • C (U+0043) has a counter-clockwise outer contour
  • D (U+0044) has a counter-clockwise outer contour
  • E (U+0045) has a counter-clockwise outer contour
  • F (U+0046) has a counter-clockwise outer contour
  • G (U+0047) has a counter-clockwise outer contour
  • H (U+0048) has a counter-clockwise outer contour
  • I (U+0049) has a counter-clockwise outer contour
    ... and 1675 others [code: ccw-outer-contour]
⚠️ WARN Check there are no overlapping path segments (overlapping_path_segments)
  • ⚠️ WARN The following glyphs have overlapping path segments:
  • Uogonek (U+0172): Quad(QuadBez { p0: (468.0, -18.0), p1: (468.0, -18.0), p2: (468.0, -18.0) }) has the same coordinates as a previous segment.
  • eogonek (U+0119): Quad(QuadBez { p0: (503.0, -18.0), p1: (503.0, -18.0), p2: (503.0, -18.0) }) has the same coordinates as a previous segment.
  • Uogonek.smcp: Quad(QuadBez { p0: (492.0, -15.0), p1: (492.0, -15.0), p2: (492.0, -15.0) }) has the same coordinates as a previous segment. [code: overlapping-path-segments]
⚠️ WARN Ensure fonts have ScriptLangTags declared on the 'meta' table. (googlefonts/meta/script_lang_tags)
  • ⚠️ WARN This font file does not have a 'meta' table. [code: lacks-meta-table]
⚠️ WARN Checking OS/2 achVendID. (googlefonts/vendor_id)
  • ⚠️ WARN OS/2 VendorID value 'pyrs' is not yet recognized.
    If you registered it recently, then it's safe to ignore this warning message. Otherwise, you should set it to your own unique 4 character code, and register it with Microsoft at https://www.microsoft.com/typography/links/vendorlist.aspx
    [code: unknown]
ℹ️ INFO Familyname must be unique according to namecheck.fontdata.com (fontdata_namecheck)
  • ℹ️ INFO The family name "Roboto Mono" seems to be already in use.
    Please visit http://namecheck.fontdata.com/ for more info. [code: name-collision]
ℹ️ INFO Show hinting filesize impact. (hinting_impact)
  • ℹ️ INFO Hinting filesize impact:
RobotoMono-Italic[wght].ttf
Dehinted Size 196768
Hinted Size 196792
Increase 24
Change 0.0 %
ℹ️ INFO Font contains all required tables? (required_tables)
  • ℹ️ INFO This font contains the following optional tables:

    loca
    prep
    GSUB
    gasp [code: optional-tables]

ℹ️ INFO Is the Grid-fitting and Scan-conversion Procedure ('gasp') table set to optimize rendering? (googlefonts/gasp)
  • ℹ️ INFO These are the ppm ranges declared on the gasp table:

| PPM <= 65535 | - Use grid-fitting |
| | - Use grayscale rendering |
| | - Use gridfitting with ClearType symmetric smoothing |

- Use smoothing along multiple axes with ClearType®
[code: ranges]
ℹ️ INFO Font has old ttfautohint applied? (googlefonts/old_ttfautohint)
  • ℹ️ INFO Could not detect which version of ttfautohint was used in this font. It is typically specified as a comment in the font version entries of the 'name' table. Such font version strings are currently: Version 3.001 [code: version-not-detected]
[1] ofl/robotomono/METADATA.pb
ℹ️ INFO Check METADATA.pb parses correctly (googlefonts/metadata/validate)
  • ℹ️ INFO Please consider adding a family.minisite_url entry. [code: lacks-minisite-url]
[2] ofl/robotomono/DESCRIPTION.en_us.html
🔥 FAIL Does DESCRIPTION file contain broken links? (googlefonts/description/broken_links)
  • 🔥 FAIL The following links are broken:
🔥 FAIL Does DESCRIPTION file contain a upstream Git repo URL? (googlefonts/description/git_url)
  • 🔥 FAIL Please host your font project on a public Git repo (such as GitHub or GitLab) and place a link in the DESCRIPTION.en_us.html file. [code: lacks-git-url]
[24] ofl/robotomono/RobotoMono[wght].ttf
🔥 FAIL Checking correctness of monospaced metadata. (opentype/monospace)
🔥 FAIL Ensure the font supports case swapping for all its glyphs. (case_mapping)
  • 🔥 FAIL The following glyphs are missing case-swapping counterparts:
Glyph present in the font Missing case-swapping counterpart
U+0259: LATIN SMALL LETTER SCHWA U+018F: LATIN CAPITAL LETTER SCHWA
U+1F4D: GREEK CAPITAL LETTER OMICRON WITH DASIA AND OXIA U+1F45: GREEK SMALL LETTER OMICRON WITH DASIA AND OXIA
🔥 FAIL Font contains '.notdef' as its first glyph? (mandatory_glyphs)
  • 🔥 FAIL The '.notdef' glyph should contain a drawing, but it is blank. [code: notdef-is-blank]
🔥 FAIL Ensure small caps glyphs are available (missing_small_caps_glyphs)
  • 🔥 FAIL The following letters did not take part in smcp substitutions:
  • uni04B9
  • ygrave
  • uni0430
  • uni0457
  • uni1EF1
  • uni1EC9
  • theta
  • uni04F7
  • uni0438
    ... and 239 others [code: missing-smcp-lowercase]
  • 🔥 FAIL The following letters did not take part in c2sc substitutions:
  • Ccedilla
  • Odieresis
  • Udieresis
  • Ntilde
  • uni0404
  • Atilde
  • uni0468
  • uni040F
  • uni04D4
    ... and 336 others [code: missing-c2sc-uppercase]
🔥 FAIL Shapes languages in all GF glyphsets. (googlefonts/glyphsets/shape_languages)
  • 🔥 FAIL Failed language shaping:
Message Languages
Mandatory orthography codepoints: * ca_Latn (Catalan)
The following mark characters are missing from the font: ̈, ̧
Mandatory orthography codepoints: * cu_Cyrl (Church Slavic)
The following base characters are missing from the font: Ꙍ, ꙍ, Ꙁ, Ꙃ, Ꙋ, Ꙗ, ꙁ, ꙋ, ꙗ, ꙃ
The following mark characters are missing from the font: ̆, ̈
Mandatory orthography codepoints: * de_Latn (German)
The following base characters are missing from the font: ẞ
The following mark characters are missing from the font: ̈
Mandatory orthography codepoints: * cs_Latn (Czech)
The following mark characters are missing from the font: ̊, ̌
Mandatory orthography codepoints: * es_Latn (Spanish)
The following mark characters are missing from the font: ̈ * el_Grek (Greek)
Mandatory orthography codepoints: * lt_Latn (Lithuanian)
The following mark characters are missing from the font: ̨, ̌, ̇, ̄
Mandatory orthography codepoints: * mt_Latn (Maltese)
The following mark characters are missing from the font: ̂, ̇
Mandatory orthography codepoints: * az_Cyrl (Azerbaijani (Cyrillic))
The following mark characters are missing from the font: ̆ * ug_Cyrl (Uyghur (Cyrillic))
* bg_Cyrl (Bulgarian)
* bg_Cyrl (Bulgarian)
* az_Cyrl (Azerbaijani (Cyrillic))
* ug_Cyrl (Uyghur (Cyrillic))
Mandatory orthography codepoints: * hr_Latn (Croatian)
The following mark characters are missing from the font: ̌
Mandatory orthography codepoints: * sq_Latn (Albanian)
The following mark characters are missing from the font: ̧, ̈
Mandatory orthography codepoints: * vi_Latn (Vietnamese)
The following mark characters are missing from the font: ̛, ̆, ̂
Mandatory orthography codepoints: * tt_Cyrl (Tatar)
The following mark characters are missing from the font: ̈, ̆ * ba_Cyrl (Bashkir)
* ce_Cyrl (Chechen)
* udm_Cyrl (Udmurt)
* rue_Cyrl (Rusyn)
* chm_Cyrl (Mari)
* kaa_Cyrl (Kara-Kalpak)
* ady_Cyrl (Adyghe)
* myv_Cyrl (Erzya)
... and 19 others
Mandatory orthography codepoints: * fi_Latn (Finnish)
The following mark characters are missing from the font: ̌, ̈, ̊
Mandatory orthography codepoints: * is_Latn (Icelandic)
The following mark characters are missing from the font: ̈, ̨
Mandatory orthography codepoints: * sk_Latn (Slovak)
The following mark characters are missing from the font: ̂, ̈, ̌
Mandatory orthography codepoints: * en_Latn (English)
The following mark characters are missing from the font: ̂, ̈, ̧ * fr_Latn (French)
Mandatory orthography codepoints: * mn_Cyrl (Mongolian)
The following mark characters are missing from the font: ̆, ̈ * ky_Cyrl (Kyrgyz)
* kbd_Cyrl (Kabardian)
* os_Cyrl (Ossetic)
* av_Cyrl (Avaric)
* sah_Cyrl (Sakha)
* dar_Cyrl (Dargwa)
* mdf_Cyrl (Moksha)
* kum_Cyrl (Kumyk)
... and 23 others
Mandatory orthography codepoints: * it_Latn (Italian)
The following mark characters are missing from the font: ̈, ̂
Mandatory orthography codepoints: * pt_Latn (Portuguese)
The following mark characters are missing from the font: ̂, ̧, ̈
Mandatory orthography codepoints: * cv_Cyrl (Chuvash)
The following mark characters are missing from the font: ̈, ̆, ̋ * cv_Cyrl (Chuvash)
Mandatory orthography codepoints: * ro_Latn (Romanian)
The following mark characters are missing from the font: ̧, ̂, ̦, ̆
Mandatory orthography codepoints: * da_Latn (Danish)
The following mark characters are missing from the font: ̊
Mandatory orthography codepoints: * tg_Cyrl (Tajik)
The following mark characters are missing from the font: ̆, ̄, ̈ * tg_Cyrl (Tajik)
Mandatory orthography codepoints: * lv_Latn (Latvian)
The following mark characters are missing from the font: ̌, ̄, ̧
Mandatory orthography codepoints: * nb_Latn (Norwegian Bokmål)
The following mark characters are missing from the font: ̂, ̈, ̊
Mandatory orthography codepoints: * hu_Latn (Hungarian)
The following mark characters are missing from the font: ̋, ̈
Mandatory orthography codepoints: * sv_Latn (Swedish)
The following mark characters are missing from the font: ̈, ̊
Mandatory orthography codepoints: * pl_Latn (Polish)
The following mark characters are missing from the font: ̇, ̨
Mandatory orthography codepoints: * cy_Latn (Welsh)
The following mark characters are missing from the font: ̂, ̈ * nl_Latn (Dutch)
Mandatory orthography codepoints: * tr_Latn (Turkish)
The following mark characters are missing from the font: ̂, ̇, ̈, ̦, ̧, ̆
  • ⚠️ WARN Warning language shaping:
Message Languages
Auxiliary orthography codepoints: * el_Grek (Greek)
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: ἀ
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: ἄ
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: ἂ
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: ἆ
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: ἁ
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: ἅ
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: ἃ
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: ἇ
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: ὰ
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: ᾶ
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: ἐ
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: ἔ
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: ἒ
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: ἑ
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: ἕ
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: ἓ
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: ὲ
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: ἠ
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: ἤ
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: ἢ
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: ἦ
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: ἡ
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: ἥ
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: ἣ
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: ἧ
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: ὴ
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: ῆ
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: ἰ
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: ἴ
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: ἲ
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: ἶ
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: ἱ
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: ἵ
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: ἳ
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: ἷ
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: ὶ
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: ῖ
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: ῒ
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: ῗ
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: ὄ
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: ὂ
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: ὃ
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: ὸ
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: ὐ
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: ὔ
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: ὒ
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: ὖ
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: ὑ
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: ὕ
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: ὓ
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: ὗ
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: ὺ
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: ῦ
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: ῢ
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: ῧ
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: ὤ
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: ὢ
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: ὦ
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: ὥ
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: ὣ
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: ὧ
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: ὼ
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: ῶ
Small caps for Latin letters: * nb_Latn (Norwegian Bokmål)
When shaping the text 'æ' and shaping the text 'æ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'ø' and shaping the text 'ø' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'ŋ' and shaping the text 'ŋ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
Small caps for Latin letters: * ro_Latn (Romanian)
When shaping the text 'ș' and shaping the text 'ș' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'ț' and shaping the text 'ț' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
Small caps for Latin letters: * cs_Latn (Czech)
When shaping the text 'æ' and shaping the text 'æ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'ł' and shaping the text 'ł' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'ø' and shaping the text 'ø' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'œ' and shaping the text 'œ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
Auxiliary orthography codepoints: * it_Latn (Italian)
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: ẞ * pl_Latn (Polish)
* tr_Latn (Turkish)
Auxiliary orthography codepoints: * lt_Latn (Lithuanian)
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: İ́
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: İ̀
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: İ̃
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: Į̇́
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: Į̇̃
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: J̇̃
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: i̇́
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: i̇̀
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: i̇̃
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: į̇́
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: į̇̃
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: j̇̃
Auxiliary orthography codepoints: * fi_Latn (Finnish)
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: Ǧ
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: Ǥ
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: Ȟ
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: Ǩ
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: ẞ
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: Ʒ
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: Ǯ
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: ǧ
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: ǥ
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: ȟ
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: ǩ
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: ʒ
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: ǯ
Small caps for Latin letters: * lt_Latn (Lithuanian)
When shaping the text 'ẽ' and shaping the text 'ẽ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
Auxiliary orthography codepoints: * en_Latn (English)
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: ʻ
Small caps for Latin letters: * is_Latn (Icelandic)
When shaping the text 'þ' and shaping the text 'þ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'æ' and shaping the text 'æ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
Small caps for Latin letters: * da_Latn (Danish)
When shaping the text 'æ' and shaping the text 'æ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'ø' and shaping the text 'ø' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'œ' and shaping the text 'œ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'ǿ' and shaping the text 'ǿ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
Small caps for Latin letters: * fr_Latn (French)
When shaping the text 'æ' and shaping the text 'æ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'œ' and shaping the text 'œ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'ø' and shaping the text 'ø' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'ſ' and shaping the text 'ſ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
Small caps for Latin letters: * fi_Latn (Finnish)
When shaping the text 'ċ' and shaping the text 'ċ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'ħ' and shaping the text 'ħ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'ı' and shaping the text 'ı' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'ł' and shaping the text 'ł' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'ŋ' and shaping the text 'ŋ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'œ' and shaping the text 'œ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'ș' and shaping the text 'ș' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'ț' and shaping the text 'ț' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'þ' and shaping the text 'þ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'æ' and shaping the text 'æ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'ø' and shaping the text 'ø' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
Auxiliary orthography codepoints: * nb_Latn (Norwegian Bokmål)
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: Ǎ
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: ǎ
Small caps for Latin letters: * mt_Latn (Maltese)
When shaping the text 'ċ' and shaping the text 'ċ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'ġ' and shaping the text 'ġ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'ħ' and shaping the text 'ħ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
Auxiliary orthography codepoints: * fr_Latn (French)
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: ẞ
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: Ǔ
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: ǔ
Small caps for Latin letters: * nl_Latn (Dutch)
When shaping the text 'æ' and shaping the text 'æ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'ij' and shaping the text 'ij' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'ø' and shaping the text 'ø' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'œ' and shaping the text 'œ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
Small caps for Latin letters: * sv_Latn (Swedish)
When shaping the text 'æ' and shaping the text 'æ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'ø' and shaping the text 'ø' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
Small caps for Latin letters: * tr_Latn (Turkish)
When shaping the text 'ı' and shaping the text 'ı' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'æ' and shaping the text 'æ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'ø' and shaping the text 'ø' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'œ' and shaping the text 'œ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
Small caps for Latin letters: * vi_Latn (Vietnamese)
When shaping the text 'ả' and shaping the text 'ả' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'ạ' and shaping the text 'ạ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'ằ' and shaping the text 'ằ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'ẳ' and shaping the text 'ẳ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'ẵ' and shaping the text 'ẵ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'ắ' and shaping the text 'ắ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'ặ' and shaping the text 'ặ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'ầ' and shaping the text 'ầ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'ẩ' and shaping the text 'ẩ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'ẫ' and shaping the text 'ẫ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'ấ' and shaping the text 'ấ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'ậ' and shaping the text 'ậ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'ẻ' and shaping the text 'ẻ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'ẽ' and shaping the text 'ẽ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'ẹ' and shaping the text 'ẹ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'ề' and shaping the text 'ề' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'ể' and shaping the text 'ể' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'ễ' and shaping the text 'ễ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'ế' and shaping the text 'ế' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'ệ' and shaping the text 'ệ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'ỉ' and shaping the text 'ỉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'ị' and shaping the text 'ị' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'ỏ' and shaping the text 'ỏ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'ọ' and shaping the text 'ọ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'ồ' and shaping the text 'ồ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'ổ' and shaping the text 'ổ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'ỗ' and shaping the text 'ỗ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'ố' and shaping the text 'ố' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'ộ' and shaping the text 'ộ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'ơ' and shaping the text 'ơ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'ờ' and shaping the text 'ờ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'ở' and shaping the text 'ở' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'ỡ' and shaping the text 'ỡ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'ớ' and shaping the text 'ớ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'ợ' and shaping the text 'ợ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'ủ' and shaping the text 'ủ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'ụ' and shaping the text 'ụ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'ư' and shaping the text 'ư' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'ừ' and shaping the text 'ừ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'ử' and shaping the text 'ử' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'ữ' and shaping the text 'ữ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'ứ' and shaping the text 'ứ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'ự' and shaping the text 'ự' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'ỳ' and shaping the text 'ỳ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'ỷ' and shaping the text 'ỷ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'ỹ' and shaping the text 'ỹ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'ỵ' and shaping the text 'ỵ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
Small caps for Latin letters: * de_Latn (German)
When shaping the text 'æ' and shaping the text 'æ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'ı' and shaping the text 'ı' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'ø' and shaping the text 'ø' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'œ' and shaping the text 'œ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'ſ' and shaping the text 'ſ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
Auxiliary orthography codepoints: * sr_Cyrl (Serbian)
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: а̂ * sr_Cyrl (Serbian)
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: е̂
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: и̂
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: о̂
The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: у̂
Small caps for Latin letters: * ca_Latn (Catalan)
When shaping the text 'æ' and shaping the text 'æ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same * en_Latn (English)
When shaping the text 'ø' and shaping the text 'ø' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same * es_Latn (Spanish)
When shaping the text 'œ' and shaping the text 'œ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same * hu_Latn (Hungarian)
* it_Latn (Italian)
* pt_Latn (Portuguese)
* sk_Latn (Slovak)
Small caps for Latin letters: * cy_Latn (Welsh)
When shaping the text 'ẃ' and shaping the text 'ẃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'ẁ' and shaping the text 'ẁ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'ẅ' and shaping the text 'ẅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'ỳ' and shaping the text 'ỳ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'æ' and shaping the text 'æ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'ø' and shaping the text 'ø' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'œ' and shaping the text 'œ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
Small caps i should be dotted: * tr_Latn (Turkish)
When shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp and shaping the text 'i' in language 'tr' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
Small caps for Latin letters: * pl_Latn (Polish)
When shaping the text 'ł' and shaping the text 'ł' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'æ' and shaping the text 'æ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
When shaping the text 'œ' and shaping the text 'œ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
🔥 FAIL OS/2.fsSelection bit 7 (USE_TYPO_METRICS) is set in all fonts. (googlefonts/use_typo_metrics)
  • 🔥 FAIL OS/2.fsSelection bit 7 (USE_TYPO_METRICS) was NOT set. [code: missing-os2-fsselection-bit7]
🔥 FAIL Version number has increased since previous release on Google Fonts? (googlefonts/version_bump)
  • 🔥 FAIL Version number 3.001007 is equal to version on Google fonts [code: same-version]
⚠️ WARN Check accent of Lcaron, dcaron, lcaron, tcaron (alt_caron)
  • ⚠️ WARN Lcaron uses component: quoteright [code: bad-mark]

  • ⚠️ WARN dcaron uses component: quoteright [code: bad-mark]

  • ⚠️ WARN lcaron uses component: quoteright [code: bad-mark]

  • ⚠️ WARN tcaron uses component: quoteright [code: bad-mark]

⚠️ WARN Does GPOS table have kerning information? (gpos_kerning_info)
  • ⚠️ WARN GPOS table lacks kerning information. [code: lacks-kern-info]
⚠️ WARN Detect any interpolation issues in the font. (interpolation_issues)
  • ⚠️ WARN Glyph i has interpolation issues:
  • Wrong start point: contour 1 should start at 2 in wght=700
  • Contour 1 becomes underweight in wght=700 compared to default [code: glyph]
  • ⚠️ WARN Glyph germandbls has interpolation issues:
  • Kink in contour 0 at node 5 [code: glyph]
  • ⚠️ WARN Glyph germandbls has interpolation issues:
  • Kink in contour 0 at node 5 [code: glyph]
  • ⚠️ WARN Glyph uni0494 has interpolation issues:
  • Kink in contour 0 at node 10 [code: glyph]
  • ⚠️ WARN Glyph uni04C7 has interpolation issues:
  • Kink in contour 0 at node 10 [code: glyph]
  • ⚠️ WARN Glyph uni04C8 has interpolation issues:
  • Kink in contour 0 at node 10 [code: glyph]
  • ⚠️ WARN Glyph uni1ECB has interpolation issues:
  • Wrong start point: contour 1 should start at 2 in wght=700
  • Contour 1 becomes underweight in wght=700 compared to default [code: glyph]
⚠️ WARN Ensure indic fonts have the Indian Rupee Sign glyph. (rupee)
  • ⚠️ WARN Font is missing the Indian Rupee Sign glyph. Please add a glyph for Indian Rupee Sign (₹) at codepoint U+20B9. [code: missing-rupee]
⚠️ WARN Does the font contain a soft hyphen? (soft_hyphen)
  • ⚠️ WARN This font has a 'Soft Hyphen' character. [code: softhyphen]
⚠️ WARN Check font contains no unreachable glyphs (unreachable_glyphs)
  • ⚠️ WARN The following glyphs could not be reached by codepoint or substitution rules:
  • two.sup
  • one.sup
  • three.sup
  • four.sup
  • five.sup
  • seven.sup
  • eight.sup [code: unreachable-glyphs]
⚠️ WARN Glyph names are all valid? (valid_glyphnames)
  • ⚠️ WARN Glyph 0x00A0 is called nonbreakingspace; must be named 'uni00A0'. [code: not-recommended-00A0]
⚠️ WARN Ensure variable fonts have relatively consistent sidebearings. (suspicious_sidebearings)
  • ⚠️ WARN Glyph "uni0485" has suspiciously high variation (z-score 14.03) in right sidebearings at locations:
    wght=457.46
    wght=541.27
    wght=700.00 [code: large-rsb-variation]

  • ⚠️ WARN Glyph "uni0484" has suspiciously high variation (z-score 14.78) in right sidebearings at locations:
    wght=457.46
    wght=541.27
    wght=700.00 [code: large-rsb-variation]

  • ⚠️ WARN Glyph "uni0483" has suspiciously high variation (z-score 13.33) in right sidebearings at locations:
    wght=457.46
    wght=541.27
    wght=700.00 [code: large-rsb-variation]

  • ⚠️ WARN Glyph "uni030F" has suspiciously high variation (z-score 11.06) in right sidebearings at locations:
    wght=100.00
    wght=233.33
    wght=333.34 [code: large-rsb-variation]

  • ⚠️ WARN Glyph "uni0486" has suspiciously high variation (z-score 16.35) in right sidebearings at locations:
    wght=457.46
    wght=541.27
    wght=700.00 [code: large-rsb-variation]

⚠️ WARN Font has correct separator glyphs? (googlefonts/separator_glyphs)
  • ⚠️ WARN The following separator glyphs are missing:
  • U+2028
  • U+2029 [code: missing-separator-glyphs]
⚠️ WARN Ensure soft_dotted characters lose their dot when combined with marks that replace the dot. (soft_dotted)
  • ⚠️ WARN The dot of soft dotted characters used in orthographies must disappear in the following strings:
  • į̀

  • į́

  • į̃

  • ị̀

  • ị́

  • ị̃
    ... and 1 othersThe dot of soft dotted characters should disappear in other cases, for example:

  • į҄

  • į̏

  • į҅

  • į҆

  • į̉

  • į҃


  • ... and 31 others [code: soft-dotted]

⚠️ WARN Check the direction of the outermost contour in each glyph (outline_direction)
  • ⚠️ WARN The following glyphs have a counter-clockwise outer contour:
  • A (U+0041) has a counter-clockwise outer contour
  • B (U+0042) has a counter-clockwise outer contour
  • C (U+0043) has a counter-clockwise outer contour
  • D (U+0044) has a counter-clockwise outer contour
  • E (U+0045) has a counter-clockwise outer contour
  • F (U+0046) has a counter-clockwise outer contour
  • G (U+0047) has a counter-clockwise outer contour
  • H (U+0048) has a counter-clockwise outer contour
  • I (U+0049) has a counter-clockwise outer contour
    ... and 1672 others [code: ccw-outer-contour]
⚠️ WARN Ensure fonts have ScriptLangTags declared on the 'meta' table. (googlefonts/meta/script_lang_tags)
  • ⚠️ WARN This font file does not have a 'meta' table. [code: lacks-meta-table]
ℹ️ INFO Familyname must be unique according to namecheck.fontdata.com (fontdata_namecheck)
  • ℹ️ INFO The family name "Roboto Mono" seems to be already in use.
    Please visit http://namecheck.fontdata.com/ for more info. [code: name-collision]
ℹ️ INFO Show hinting filesize impact. (hinting_impact)
  • ℹ️ INFO Hinting filesize impact:
RobotoMono[wght].ttf
Dehinted Size 183676
Hinted Size 183700
Increase 24
Change 0.0 %
ℹ️ INFO Font contains all required tables? (required_tables)
  • ℹ️ INFO This font contains the following optional tables:

    loca
    prep
    GSUB
    gasp [code: optional-tables]

ℹ️ INFO Is the Grid-fitting and Scan-conversion Procedure ('gasp') table set to optimize rendering? (googlefonts/gasp)
  • ℹ️ INFO These are the ppm ranges declared on the gasp table:

| PPM <= 65535 | - Use grid-fitting |
| | - Use grayscale rendering |
| | - Use gridfitting with ClearType symmetric smoothing |

- Use smoothing along multiple axes with ClearType®
[code: ranges]
ℹ️ INFO Font has old ttfautohint applied? (googlefonts/old_ttfautohint)
  • ℹ️ INFO Could not detect which version of ttfautohint was used in this font. It is typically specified as a comment in the font version entries of the 'name' table. Such font version strings are currently: Version 3.001 [code: version-not-detected]

Summary

🔥 FAIL ⚠️ WARN ℹ️ INFO ✅ PASS ⏩ SKIP
23 55 14 223 72
6% 15% 4% 63% 20%

Copy link
Collaborator

@m4rc1e m4rc1e left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM but scared to merge. cc @nyshadhr9

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

I Small Fix bugs fixed but nothing added

Projects

Status: PR GF

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants