FGD: if Object is unknown Resource, default to target_source - #259
Open
Catboy-Slim wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
FGD: if Object is unknown Resource, default to target_source#259Catboy-Slim wants to merge 1 commit into
Catboy-Slim wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
When I set my type to Object, it's not saved and reverted when i re-open godot. I set it to Resource instead, but this produces a syntax error due to the res:// path. This change makes it a target_source if the Resource type is unknown, because it would have produced a syntax error anyways.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
When I set my type to Object, it's not saved and reverted when i re-open godot. I set it to Resource instead, but this produces a syntax error due to the res:// path. This change makes it a target_source if the Resource type is unknown, because it would have produced a syntax error anyways.