🔖 release: common@0.0.13, mobile@1.1.21, server@0.2.70#819
Conversation
|
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. WalkthroughDeleted three changeset metadata files, added changelog entries for root/common/server, and bumped package versions/dependency workspace references across root, server, common, docs, and .maestro; no runtime code or public API changes. Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 2✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
Summary of ChangesHello @cruzdanilo, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request facilitates an automated patch release for the Highlights
Changelog
Activity
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
0ff2fc7 to
99052e0
Compare
| { | ||
| "name": "@exactly/server", | ||
| "version": "0.2.69", | ||
| "version": "0.2.70", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Bug: The version of @exactly/server is bumped, but the corresponding dependency in the root package.json is not updated, creating an inconsistent workspace.
Severity: MEDIUM
Suggested Fix
Update the devDependencies in the root package.json to reference the new version of the server package. The dependency for "@exactly/server" should be changed from "workspace:^0.2.69" to "workspace:^0.2.70". After this change, run pnpm install to update the pnpm-lock.yaml file accordingly and include it in the pull request.
Prompt for AI Agent
Review the code at the location below. A potential bug has been identified by an AI
agent.
Verify if this is a real issue. If it is, propose a fix; if not, explain why it's not
valid.
Location: server/package.json#L3
Potential issue: The pull request updates the version of the `@exactly/server` package
to `0.2.70` but fails to update the corresponding dependency references in other
packages within the monorepo. Specifically, the root `package.json` still references
`"@exactly/server": "workspace:^0.2.69"`. While `pnpm` might correctly resolve the
version due to the caret range, this creates an inconsistent state in the repository.
This indicates an incomplete release process, as the `pnpm-lock.yaml` file is also not
updated, which can lead to unpredictable dependency resolution and potential build
failures in CI/CD or local development environments.
Did we get this right? 👍 / 👎 to inform future reviews.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request updates @exactly/server to version 0.2.70 as part of a standard release. A security audit confirmed no vulnerabilities of medium, high, or critical severity. The changes involve removing the changeset file, updating CHANGELOG.md to document the new card statement feature, and updating the version in package.json. The automated Changesets workflow seems correctly managed, and versioning is consistent. A minor observation was made regarding the engines field in package.json, which specifies ^24.13.0 for Node.js, likely a typo for ^20.13.0 or ^22.13.0.
|
✅ All tests passed. |
99052e0 to
3e7ed90
Compare
ec66eda to
057c5ff
Compare
057c5ff to
ff8a824
Compare
ff8a824 to
313b9fe
Compare
This PR was opened by the Changesets release GitHub action. When you're ready to do a release, you can merge this and the packages will be published to npm automatically. If you're not ready to do a release yet, that's fine, whenever you add more changesets to main, this PR will be updated.
Releases
@exactly/mobile@1.1.21
Patch Changes
#820
cce29b9Thanks @cruzdanilo! - 🥅 stabilize error fingerprints and titles#820
d1e6becThanks @cruzdanilo! - 🥅 distinguish contract reverts by route and reasonUpdated dependencies [
4b635eb,709cd32,1902307,dffa26b]:@exactly/common@0.0.13
Patch Changes
1902307Thanks @cruzdanilo! - 🚚 extract revert reason for cross-package reuse@exactly/server@0.2.70
Patch Changes
#820
4b635ebThanks @cruzdanilo! - 🥅 improve sentry grouping for external service failures#820
709cd32Thanks @cruzdanilo! - 🥅 normalize contract reverts on sentry#770
dffa26bThanks @nfmelendez! - ✨ add card statementSummary by CodeRabbit