Added development branch in tpn-subnet repo#263
Conversation
|
hi can you provide me with some PRs from yourself or others to this repository to show that they follow this workflow/branch merging pattern |
I've fixed critical error in this PR and I've been make PRs on taofu-labs/tpn-subnet#157 - (Closed PR - myself) Thanks. |
|
this explanation is confusing to me, not sure why you're making multiple PRs and I see no feedback from maintainers on your PRs/direction, so I'm unsure myself where they are putting contributions. It's possible they aren't accepting contributions at the moment I will wait until you get a clear comment from maintainers saying how/where to PR, or you have a concrete example of a merged PR from that repository (doesn't have to be yours) where they consistently merge to the branch you're suggesting to add. |
|
Thanks
…On Sat, Mar 7, 2026 at 10:52 PM Ander ***@***.***> wrote:
Merged #263 <#263> into test.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#263 (comment)>, or
unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAQGYNLPCZSMZXS6SHWG4LD4PRVYJAVCNFSM6AAAAACWG6D6SGVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV45UABCJFZXG5LFIV3GK3TUJZXXI2LGNFRWC5DJN5XDWMRTGM3DCNZSGQ3TCMI>
.
You are receiving this because you modified the open/close state.Message
ID: ***@***.***>
|
Co-authored-by: James Scott <JamesScott.1020@outlook.com> Co-authored-by: Ander <61125407+anderdc@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: James Scott <JamesScott.1020@outlook.com> Co-authored-by: Ander <61125407+anderdc@users.noreply.github.com>
Summary
Add
developmenttoadditional_acceptable_branchesfortaofu-labs/tpn-subnetingittensor/validator/weights/master_repositories.json.Why
The TPN subnet follows this branching model:
The
developmentbranch acts as the main integration branch where all reviewed and approved pull requests are merged.Stable releases are prepared by merging development into master and performing a version increment at the same time.
Careful version management is critical for the subnet’s health, ensuring that protocol changes, incentive mechanisms, and neuron communication remain compatible across participants.
Changes