Update renovate config

[AlexSkrypnyk]

Updated renovate config via 🤠 RepoRanger.

[coderabbitai]

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@AlexSkrypnyk has exceeded the limit for the number of commits that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 1 minutes and 3 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

ℹ️ Review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro

Run ID: a5515d72-2f69-40e4-ae75-997083d545d9

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 552e264 and 4576505.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• renovate.json

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Commit unit tests in branch feature/repo-ranger-renovate

📝 Coding Plan

• Generate coding plan for human review comments

---

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[github-actions]

🚀 Performance Test Results

✅ Performance is within acceptable limits (±5% threshold)

Click to see Performance Comparison Table

Percentages show change compared to baseline

benchmark	subject	set	revs	its	mem_peak	mode	rstdev
DiscoveryBenchmark	benchCustomProviders	0 custom provider	50	20	2.033mb -2.21%	0.120μs -25.00%	± 0.00% +233.33%
DiscoveryBenchmark	benchCustomProviders	1 custom provider	50	20	2.033mb -2.21%	1.000μs +2.02%	± 0.99% -16.32%
DiscoveryBenchmark	benchCustomProviders	2 custom providers	50	20	2.033mb -2.21%	1.961μs -0.14%	± 0.97% -31.19%
DiscoveryBenchmark	benchCustomProviders	5 custom providers	50	20	2.033mb -2.21%	4.973μs -0.24%	± 2.01% +140.28%
DiscoveryBenchmark	benchCustomProviders	10 custom providers	50	20	2.033mb -2.21%	9.985μs +0.01%	± 2.08% +74.18%
DiscoveryBenchmark	benchCustomContexts	0 custom context	50	20	2.033mb -2.21%	0.120μs -25.00%	± 0.00% +233.33%
DiscoveryBenchmark	benchCustomContexts	1 custom context	50	20	2.033mb -2.21%	1.000μs +2.00%	± 1.34% -11.35%
DiscoveryBenchmark	benchCustomContexts	2 custom contexts	50	20	2.033mb -2.21%	1.980μs +0.80%	± 0.63% -41.67%
DiscoveryBenchmark	benchCustomContexts	5 custom contexts	50	20	2.033mb -2.21%	4.968μs -0.25%	± 0.40% -74.29%
DiscoveryBenchmark	benchCustomContexts	10 custom contexts	50	20	2.033mb -2.21%	9.987μs +0.02%	± 1.96% +121.24%
InitBenchmark	benchIsAfterInit	0, F	50	20	2.033mb -2.21%	0.100μs -16.67%	± 0.00% -76.00%
InitBenchmark	benchIsAfterInit	1, F	50	20	2.033mb -2.21%	0.340μs -10.54%	± 3.01% +19.04%
InitBenchmark	benchIsAfterInit	2, F	50	20	2.033mb -2.21%	0.580μs -3.33%	± 1.69% +27.54%
InitBenchmark	benchIsAfterInit	3, F	50	20	2.033mb -2.21%	0.800μs -2.45%	± 1.58% -1.32%
InitBenchmark	benchIsAfterInit	4, F	50	20	2.033mb -2.21%	1.020μs -2.14%	± 0.86% -49.10%
InitBenchmark	benchIsAfterInit	5, F	50	20	2.033mb -2.21%	1.221μs -5.58%	± 1.19% -46.55%
InitBenchmark	benchIsAfterInit	10, F	50	20	2.033mb -2.21%	2.360μs -3.13%	± 0.49% -71.34%
InitBenchmark	benchIsAfterInit	100, F	50	20	2.033mb -2.21%	23.071μs +0.07%	± 1.29% -26.00%
InitBenchmark	benchIsAfterInit	1000, F	50	20	2.033mb -2.21%	228.447μs -2.46%	± 0.75% -66.04%
InitBenchmark	benchIsAfterInit	0, T	50	20	2.033mb -2.21%	0.100μs -16.67%	± 0.00% -76.00%
InitBenchmark	benchIsAfterInit	1, T	50	20	2.033mb -2.21%	0.340μs -10.54%	± 2.38% -7.14%
InitBenchmark	benchIsAfterInit	2, T	50	20	2.033mb -2.21%	0.598μs -0.39%	± 2.78% +15.85%
InitBenchmark	benchIsAfterInit	3, T	50	20	2.033mb -2.21%	0.800μs -2.98%	± 1.99% -23.79%
InitBenchmark	benchIsAfterInit	4, T	50	20	2.033mb -2.21%	1.020μs -4.56%	± 0.62% -70.27%
InitBenchmark	benchIsAfterInit	5, T	50	20	2.033mb -2.21%	1.221μs -6.74%	± 1.16% -48.30%
InitBenchmark	benchIsAfterInit	10, T	50	20	2.033mb -2.21%	2.365μs -2.93%	± 1.25% -54.36%
InitBenchmark	benchIsAfterInit	100, T	50	20	2.033mb -2.21%	22.857μs -1.27%	± 1.04% -57.14%
InitBenchmark	benchIsAfterInit	1000, T	50	20	2.033mb -2.21%	228.337μs -2.50%	± 0.91% -46.83%

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 99.02%. Comparing base (552e264) to head (4576505).
✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main      #51   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   99.02%   99.02%           
=======================================
  Files          16       16           
  Lines         205      205           
=======================================
  Hits          203      203           
  Misses          2        2           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.