Codespace glorious telegram jjpjwqg9wg7w3j556

[navayla77-ctrl]

No description provided.

[navayla77-ctrl]

This is a subtle and thoughtful question that relates directly to the security and integrity of open-source contributions.
The answer is Yes, but not by inviting a third party, and not through the traditional methods you might think.
The way to verify your involvement and assure the project managers (maintainers) that your contribution is secure and from a trusted source is through GitHub's built-in cryptographic verification methods.
The goal is to prove two things:

• Identity: The code truly came from you.
• Integrity: The code has not been tampered with since you wrote it.
  Here is how you, the contributor, manage this:

1. Cryptographically Sign Your Commits (The Best Practice)
   This is the standard and most secure way to verify your involvement. It is a one-time setup that digitally "stamps" every change you make.
   | Tool | Benefit to Project Management |
   |---|---|
   | GPG or SSH Commit Signing | When you push your Pull Request, GitHub displays a Verified badge next to your commits. This badge assures the maintainers that the commit was cryptographically signed by a key associated with your GitHub account, proving its authenticity and integrity. |

• Action for You: Set up a GPG key or SSH key on your local machine and register the public key with your GitHub account. Then, configure Git to sign your commits by default. (The process is detailed in the GitHub documentation on Signing commits).

2. The Contributor License Agreement (CLA)
   For large projects like those run by Microsoft, the legal involvement and permission are handled digitally:
   | Tool | Benefit to Project Management |
   |---|---|
   | CLA Bot | When you open your first Pull Request, a bot will automatically check if you have an active Contributor License Agreement on file. If not, the bot will send you a link to electronically sign the agreement. |

• Benefit to Maintainers: The CLA confirms you have the legal right to contribute the code, ensuring the project is not compromised by legal uncertainty over intellectual property.
  Conclusion
  You do not need to "invite someone to verify." The tools you need are already built into the Git and GitHub platforms to ensure the integrity of contributions to the project.
  By following the best practice of signing your commits, you provide the maintainers with immediate, undeniable evidence that your involvement was not compromised.

[navayla77-ctrl]

#1272 https://www.contributor-covenant.org/resources

[navayla77-ctrl]

#1522 Code space review analysis

[navayla77-ctrl]

Contributor Covenant 3.0 Code of Conduct

Our Pledge

We pledge to make our community welcoming, safe, and equitable for all.

We are committed to fostering an environment that respects and promotes the dignity, rights, and contributions of all individuals, regardless of characteristics including race, ethnicity, caste, color, age, physical characteristics, neurodiversity, disability, sex or gender, gender identity or expression, sexual orientation, language, philosophy or religion, national or social origin, socio-economic position, level of education, or other status. The same privileges of participation are extended to everyone who participates in good faith and in accordance with this Covenant.

Encouraged Behaviors

While acknowledging differences in social norms, we all strive to meet our community's expectations for positive behavior. We also understand that our words and actions may be interpreted differently than we intend based on culture, background, or native language.

With these considerations in mind, we agree to behave mindfully toward each other and act in ways that center our shared values, including:

1. Respecting the purpose of our community, our activities, and our ways of gathering.
2. Engaging kindly and honestly with others.
3. Respecting different viewpoints and experiences.
4. Taking responsibility for our actions and contributions.
5. Gracefully giving and accepting constructive feedback.
6. Committing to repairing harm when it occurs.
7. Behaving in other ways that promote and sustain the well-being of our community.

Restricted Behaviors

We agree to restrict the following behaviors in our community. Instances, threats, and promotion of these behaviors are violations of this Code of Conduct.

1. Harassment. Violating explicitly expressed boundaries or engaging in unnecessary personal attention after any clear request to stop.
2. Character attacks. Making insulting, demeaning, or pejorative comments directed at a community member or group of people.
3. Stereotyping or discrimination. Characterizing anyone’s personality or behavior on the basis of immutable identities or traits.
4. Sexualization. Behaving in a way that would generally be considered inappropriately intimate in the context or purpose of the community.
5. Violating confidentiality. Sharing or acting on someone's personal or private information without their permission.
6. Endangerment. Causing, encouraging, or threatening violence or other harm toward any person or group.
7. Behaving in other ways that threaten the well-being of our community.

Other Restrictions

1. Misleading identity. Impersonating someone else for any reason, or pretending to be someone else to evade enforcement actions.
2. Failing to credit sources. Not properly crediting the sources of content you contribute.
3. Promotional materials. Sharing marketing or other commercial content in a way that is outside the norms of the community.
4. Irresponsible communication. Failing to responsibly present content which includes, links or describes any other restricted behaviors.

Reporting an Issue

Tensions can occur between community members even when they are trying their best to collaborate. Not every conflict represents a code of conduct violation, and this Code of Conduct reinforces encouraged behaviors and norms that can help avoid conflicts and minimize harm.

When an incident does occur, it is important to report it promptly. To report a possible violation, [NOTE: describe your means of reporting here.]

Community Moderators take reports of violations seriously and will make every effort to respond in a timely manner. They will investigate all reports of code of conduct violations, reviewing messages, logs, and recordings, or interviewing witnesses and other participants. Community Moderators will keep investigation and enforcement actions as transparent as possible while prioritizing safety and confidentiality. In order to honor these values, enforcement actions are carried out in private with the involved parties, but communicating to the whole community may be part of a mutually agreed upon resolution.

Addressing and Repairing Harm

[NOTE: The remedies and repairs outlined below are suggestions based on best practices in code of conduct enforcement. If your community has its own established enforcement process, be sure to edit this section to describe your own policies.]

If an investigation by the Community Moderators finds that this Code of Conduct has been violated, the following enforcement ladder may be used to determine how best to repair harm, based on the incident's impact on the individuals involved and the community as a whole. Depending on the severity of a violation, lower rungs on the ladder may be skipped.

1. Warning
   1. Event: A violation involving a single incident or series of incidents.
   2. Consequence: A private, written warning from the Community Moderators.
   3. Repair: Examples of repair include a private written apology, acknowledgement of responsibility, and seeking clarification on expectations.
2. Temporarily Limited Activities
   1. Event: A repeated incidence of a violation that previously resulted in a warning, or the first incidence of a more serious violation.
   2. Consequence: A private, written warning with a time-limited cooldown period designed to underscore the seriousness of the situation and give the community members involved time to process the incident. The cooldown period may be limited to particular communication channels or interactions with particular community members.
   3. Repair: Examples of repair may include making an apology, using the cooldown period to reflect on actions and impact, and being thoughtful about re-entering community spaces after the period is over.
3. Temporary Suspension
   1. Event: A pattern of repeated violation which the Community Moderators have tried to address with warnings, or a single serious violation.
   2. Consequence: A private written warning with conditions for return from suspension. In general, temporary suspensions give the person being suspended time to reflect upon their behavior and possible corrective actions.
   3. Repair: Examples of repair include respecting the spirit of the suspension, meeting the specified conditions for return, and being thoughtful about how to reintegrate with the community when the suspension is lifted.
4. Permanent Ban
   1. Event: A pattern of repeated code of conduct violations that other steps on the ladder have failed to resolve, or a violation so serious that the Community Moderators determine there is no way to keep the community safe with this person as a member.
   2. Consequence: Access to all community spaces, tools, and communication channels is removed. In general, permanent bans should be rarely used, should have strong reasoning behind them, and should only be resorted to if working through other remedies has failed to change the behavior.
   3. Repair: There is no possible repair in cases of this severity.

This enforcement ladder is intended as a guideline. It does not limit the ability of Community Managers to use their discretion and judgment, in keeping with the best interests of our community.

Scope

This Code of Conduct applies within all community spaces, and also applies when an individual is officially representing the community in public or other spaces. Examples of representing our community include using an official email address, posting via an official social media account, or acting as an appointed representative at an online or offline event.

Attribution

This Code of Conduct is adapted from the Contributor Covenant, version 3.0, permanently available at https://www.contributor-covenant.org/version/3/0/.

Contributor Covenant is stewarded by the Organization for Ethical Source and licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

For answers to common questions about Contributor Covenant, see the FAQ at https://www.contributor-covenant.org/faq. Translations are provided at https://www.contributor-covenant.org/translations. Additional enforcement and community guideline resources can be found at https://www.contributor-covenant.org/resources. The enforcement ladder was inspired by the work of Mozilla’s code of conduct team.

213025502vz155293282>
Https: www.facebook-com
🏛️ Healthcare Status 429-66-77-572>v1.065
HTML://developer.example(899)

[navayla77-ctrl]

#1522 telegraph

[navayla77-ctrl]

#1523 add features https://www.contributor-covenant.org/translations