ENT-13161: Aligned Hub package perms for share/GUI on EL and Debian platforms with the MPF#1838
Conversation
c784d32 to
92b0edb
Compare
|
The debs failed building the first time, made a change and building again. I think the RPM change looks good in my manual testing. Checking rpm -V on el9upgraded after running bootstrap to self: That looks like a pretty good improvement. 1 file from share/GUI and it's not a permission difference modification. Compared with 3.24.2 after clean install: And after bootstrap to self: |
|
Trying to fix perms for ppkeys on debian package. Unsure why, but my change seems to be causing bootstrap to fail with ppkeys being UNTRUSTED (755) instead of (x00) |
…th the MPF The MPF enforces permissions of 400 and group and user ownership of root. While the mis-alignment stabilizes, it does cause verification errors for RPM packages that persists. This change brings the packaged permissions of share/GUI in alignment with the MPF. Ticket: ENT-13161 Changelog: Title
3063893 to
1456c53
Compare
|
@cf-bottom jenkins please! |
|
Alright, I triggered a build: Jenkins: https://ci.cfengine.com/job/pr-pipeline/12489/ Packages: http://buildcache.cfengine.com/packages/testing-pr/jenkins-pr-pipeline-12489/ |
The MPF enforces permissions of 400 and group and user ownership of root. While
the mis-alignment stabilizes, it does cause verification errors for RPM packages
that persists. This change brings the packaged permissions of share/GUI in
alignment with the MPF.
Ticket: ENT-13161
Changelog: Title