Skip to content

chore(ci): fix failing cargo deny check#241

Merged
calbera merged 2 commits intomainfrom
claude/fix-cargo-deny-audit-hK8Kg
Apr 16, 2026
Merged

chore(ci): fix failing cargo deny check#241
calbera merged 2 commits intomainfrom
claude/fix-cargo-deny-audit-hK8Kg

Conversation

@calbera
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@calbera calbera commented Apr 16, 2026

Update rustls-webpki 0.103.10 -> 0.103.12 to fix RUSTSEC-2026-0098 and RUSTSEC-2026-0099. Remove stale RUSTSEC-2026-0002 ignore entry.

Update rustls-webpki 0.103.10 -> 0.103.12 to fix RUSTSEC-2026-0098
and RUSTSEC-2026-0099. Remove stale RUSTSEC-2026-0002 ignore entry.

https://claude.ai/code/session_01TnR3oE65boQ7YirYDFoE1w
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings April 16, 2026 09:41
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown

coderabbitai bot commented Apr 16, 2026

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@calbera has exceeded the limit for the number of commits that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 45 minutes and 59 seconds before requesting another review.

Your organization is not enrolled in usage-based pricing. Contact your admin to enable usage-based pricing to continue reviews beyond the rate limit, or try again in 45 minutes and 59 seconds.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 4c8bc9ea-a31c-430e-868f-44a272189626

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 26762fb and f9ffe08.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • Cargo.lock is excluded by !**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • deny.toml
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch claude/fix-cargo-deny-audit-hK8Kg

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@calbera calbera changed the title fix(ci): fix failing cargo deny check chore(ci): fix failing cargo deny check Apr 16, 2026
@calbera calbera requested a review from a team April 16, 2026 09:42
@calbera calbera enabled auto-merge (squash) April 16, 2026 09:42
@calbera calbera disabled auto-merge April 16, 2026 09:42
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Updates Rust dependency metadata to resolve a failing cargo deny advisory check by moving off vulnerable rustls-webpki versions and cleaning up an obsolete advisory ignore.

Changes:

  • Bump rustls-webpki from 0.103.10 to 0.103.12 in Cargo.lock (addresses RUSTSEC-2026-0098 / RUSTSEC-2026-0099).
  • Remove the stale RUSTSEC-2026-0002 entry from the cargo-deny ignore list in deny.toml.

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 1 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

File Description
deny.toml Removes an obsolete RustSec advisory ignore entry so cargo deny no longer flags it as stale.
Cargo.lock Updates rustls-webpki to 0.103.12 (and corresponding checksum) to remediate the reported advisories.

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

@calbera calbera merged commit 1898a51 into main Apr 16, 2026
10 checks passed
@calbera calbera deleted the claude/fix-cargo-deny-audit-hK8Kg branch April 16, 2026 10:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants