Remove duplicated build system in alien/ArcaneInterface

[guignont]

A proposal to remove buildsystem part in Alien ArcaneInterface

[grospelliergilles]

I think it is a good idea to remove duplication.
So now it uses the configuration from app_buildsystem_tools ?

[guignont]

I think it is a good idea to remove duplication. So now it uses the configuration from app_buildsystem_tools ?

Yes

[guignont]

@grospelliergilles It's seem that Ubuntu used for Codecov test lacks Mono and DotNet.
Is it possible to install them ?

[grospelliergilles]

@grospelliergilles It's seem that Ubuntu used for Codecov test lacks Mono and DotNet. Is it possible to install them ?

we no longer support mono but dotnet is present in the image used by codecov. You can see in this action for example; https://github.com/arcaneframework/framework/actions/runs/12191621972/job/34010826688. The tests used by dotnet contains the string corecrl in their name.

If needed we can install mono. @stdcm may know if it is really needed. Maybe it is possible to remove this find_package().

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 70.30%. Comparing base (8a25326) to head (34fa47e).
Report is 3 commits behind head on main.

✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1814      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   70.31%   70.30%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files        2275     2275              
  Lines      163815   163813       -2     
  Branches    18871    18869       -2     
==========================================
- Hits       115183   115175       -8     
- Misses      41799    41801       +2     
- Partials     6833     6837       +4     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[stdcm]

Thanks for the fixes. The Arcane CI is ok but when installing and trying with ArcaneDemo, AlienLegacyPlugins is not found. Maybe the modifications to handle AlienPlugins are not fully reported in app_buildsystem_tools...?

[guignont]

@stdcm
Can you describe framework build and install procedure for use with ArcaneDemo because my ArcaneDemo build has no problem finding AlienLegacyPlugins ?

[guignont]

I just made the following test in ArcaneDemo replacing build-system with the one in this branch.
The configuration with cmake works fine but when compiling there is errors in c++ generated files:

In file included from /work/guignont/work/ArcaneDemo/cmake-build-debug-arcane3user_gimkl2018b_localarcane/ArcaneDemo/axl/RootTester_axl.h:507:0,
from /work/guignont/work/ArcaneDemo/common/ArcGeoSim/src/ArcGeoSim/Tests/ServiceTesters/StrongOptionsTester/RootTesterService.h:10,
from /work/guignont/work/ArcaneDemo/common/ArcGeoSim/src/ArcGeoSim/Tests/ServiceTesters/StrongOptionsTester/RootTesterService.cc:6:
/work/guignont/work/ArcaneDemo/cmake-build-debug-arcane3user_gimkl2018b_localarcane/ArcaneDemo/axl/RootTester_CaseOptionsT.h:133:65: error: « ; » attendu à la fin de la déclaration du membre
Arcane::ConstArrayViewTypesStrongOptionsTester::eSimpleEnum simpleEnum4 const
^~~~~~~~~~~
/work/guignont/work/ArcaneDemo/cmake-build-debug-arcane3user_gimkl2018b_localarcane/ArcaneDemo/axl/RootTester_CaseOptionsT.h:134:3: error: expected unqualified-id before « { » token
{
^
/work/guignont/work/ArcaneDemo/cmake-build-debug-arcane3user_gimkl2018b_localarcane/ArcaneDemo/axl/RootTester_CaseOptionsT.h:137:65: error: « ; » attendu à la fin de la déclaration du membre
Arcane::ConstArrayViewTypesStrongOptionsTester::eSimpleEnum simpleEnum5 const
^~~~~~~~~~~
/work/guignont/work/ArcaneDemo/cmake-build-debug-arcane3user_gimkl2018b_localarcane/ArcaneDemo/axl/RootTester_CaseOptionsT.h:138:3: error: expected unqualified-id before « { » token
{

Anyway with a manual correction the build is ok.

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud