GH-3545: Use parquet-java in SCM block#3546
Merged
Merged
Conversation
The repository was renamed from apache/parquet-mr to apache/parquet-java but the SCM block was never updated.
Fokko
approved these changes
May 6, 2026
Contributor
Fokko
left a comment
Fokko
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Good one @RussellSpitzer 👍
Fokko
changed the title
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Rationale for this change
The repository was renamed from apache/parquet-mr to apache/parquet-java but the SCM block was never updated. Everything has been working because Github maintains the redirect from one url to the other but it's probably better that we don't rely on the redirect.
I noticed this while I was prototyping some release automation.
What changes are included in this PR?
The parquet-mr is replaced with parquet-java
Are these changes tested?
Checked that mvn validate still works and it does.
Are there any user-facing changes?
No
Closes #3545