Sorted-Set based implementation#1
Open
paulbellamy wants to merge 2 commits into
Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I read through your library, and found it really interesting. We do a lot of work with time-series data, and would love to use redis for it. However, we need to be able to insert data into the past, so I added a basic implementation based on sorted-sets. Hopefully it would be a useful example for other people.
I've 'bucketed' the data into 'timestep' keys, to keep inserts quicker, and help break data across a redis-cluster. I'm curious what your thoughts on this implementation are. Is it possible to do it more efficiently?
Thanks,
Paul