Skip to content

agzam/remoto.el

Repository files navigation

El Remoto

El Remoto logo

https://github.com/agzam/remoto.el/actions/workflows/run-tests.yml/badge.svg

El Remoto - browse any GitHub repository in Emacs just like any local - without cloning.

What

Wouldn’t it be nice to be able to C-x C-f and just browse any GitHub repo?

./test/demo.gif

remoto.el registers a virtual filesystem via file-name-handler-alist that translates standard Emacs file operations into GitHub API calls via the ghub library. The result: find-file, dired, tab-completion, dired-subtree - all standard Emacs file tooling works against a remote GitHub repo. Read-only.

Why

Sometimes you just want to look at code. Check a function signature, read a README, browse a project structure. Cloning a repo for that is overkill - it takes disk space, creates another directory to manage, and breaks your flow.

Where

For now it works only with GitHub repos. Future plans include support for other forges - GitLab, Codeberg, etc.

How

use-package + straight

You need to load the package so it can register its file handler and advice.

(use-package remoto
  :straight (:host github :repo "agzam/remoto.el")
  :demand t)

The package is not on MELPA yet. Maybe upvote the submission PR, who knows, perhaps it gets accepted faster.

Usage

remoto-browse

The main entry point. Accepts any GitHub URL format:

M-x remoto-browse RET https://github.com/torvalds/linux RET
M-x remoto-browse RET git@github.com:torvalds/linux.git RET
M-x remoto-browse RET torvalds/linux RET

C-x d / C-x C-f

GitHub URLs are detected automatically in dired and find-file:

C-x C-f /github:torvalds/linux RET

;; shorthand also works
C-x C-f /gh:torvalds/linux RET

;; complete urls work too
C-x C-f https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/README RET

find-file completion

The /github: prefix (/gh: shorthand works too) enables multi-level completion directly in find-file (C-x C-f). Three delimiters after owner/repo control the mode: / for files, @ for branches/tags, # for issues/PRs.

/github:              -> your user + orgs (when authenticated)
/github:tor           -> users/orgs matching "tor"
/github:torvalds/     -> repos (with descriptions)
/github:torvalds/linux/        -> files on default branch (with last commit messages)
/github:torvalds/linux@        -> branches + tags (grouped)
/github:torvalds/linux@master: -> file-level completion
/github:torvalds/linux#        -> issues + PRs

Each level shows annotations: repo descriptions, issue/PR titles and state, file commit messages, user/org type. Works with vanilla completion, Vertico, Corfu, etc.

Hitting RET on /github:owner/repo opens the default branch. /github:owner/repo#42 opens an issue/PR display buffer.

Canonical paths

The virtual filesystem uses paths of the form:

/github:OWNER/REPO@REF:/PATH

REF is optional - omitting it uses the repo’s default branch.

Issue/PR display

Opening /github:owner/repo#42 shows a dedicated buffer with the issue or PR content. For PRs: diff stats, branch info, merge status, and review summary. For both: body + comments.

Keybindings in the display buffer: b (open in browser), g (refresh).

Commands

CommandDescription
remoto-browsePrompt for a repo, open dired at root
remoto-refreshClear tree cache for current repo, re-fetch
remoto-copy-github-urlCopy github.com URL for current file/line to kill ring

Embark integration

Optional Embark integration lives in remoto-embark.el. Embark is not a hard dependency; when it is installed the integration activates automatically, with nothing to configure. With it active, embark-act offers forge-agnostic actions on remoto targets in remoto file buffers, dired, and /github: minibuffer completion (including embark-collect).

Each target type has its own keymap of actions that reuse remoto’s forge-agnostic URL layer (copy or browse the web URL, clone, blame, permalink, open an issue/PR, and so on):

TargetExampleKeymap
remoto-owner/github:torvaldsremoto-embark-owner-map
remoto-repo/github:torvalds/linux:/remoto-embark-repo-map
remoto-branch/github:torvalds/linux@master:/remoto-embark-branch-map
remoto-issue/github:torvalds/linux#42remoto-embark-issue-map
remoto-dir/github:torvalds/linux@master:/fsremoto-embark-dir-map
remoto-file/github:torvalds/linux@master:/READMEremoto-embark-file-map

Run embark-act on a target to see its actions and keys. Cloning honors remoto-clone-url-type, and Embark’s built-in url target gains R to open a forge URL at point as a remoto path.

How does it work

  1. On first access to any file in a repo, the full directory tree is fetched via the Git Trees API (one HTTP call).
  2. Directory listings, file-exists-p, completions - all served from the cached tree in memory.
  3. File contents are fetched on demand when you actually open a file.
  4. Content is cached by SHA, so re-opening the same file is instant.
  5. Authentication, SSO, private repos - all handled transparently by ghub.

FAQ

Why this isn’t a TRAMP backend?

  • TRAMP fundamentally is a shell-over-transport abstraction. Every TRAMP backend assumes a remote shell on the other end, remoto.el has no remote shell.
  • TRAMP’s backend API is large. You’d need to implement or stub dozens of operations, many of which assume concepts that don’t map to a REST API (process execution, file ownership, symlink resolution, timestamps).
  • TRAMP’s connection management (open/close/reuse) is built around persistent sessions. The GitHub API is stateless HTTP - there’s no connection to manage.
  • TRAMP’s caching layer is path-based and per-connection. remoto’s tree cache (one API call fetches the entire repo tree, then everything is served from memory) is a fundamentally different - and much more efficient - model for a read-only tree-structured API.
  • file-name-handler-alist IS the same mechanism TRAMP uses. Registering there directly gives you the same integration (dired, find-file, completions) without the framework overhead.

For a read-only tree browser backed by a REST API, a direct file-name-handler is the simpler, more natural fit

Why not just use plain HTTP?

Git’s own protocols let you talk to a remote repo without cloning it, so why not use that, right?

  • Tree listing. There’s no raw HTTP URL that gives you a directory listing. raw.githubblabla.com can’t do directory indexes. You’d have to shell out to git ls-tree ... etc. over the ssh, which means essentially implementing a partial git client.
  • Branch listing and repo search - no git protocol equivalent for those - need the API
  • Current approach fetches the entire tree in one API call. Doing the same over git pack protocol means negotiating a fetch, receiving packfile data and parsing it. Much heavier, much more code.

We can only imagine a world where git’s transport layer gives you a browsable filesystem interface. It doesn’t - git’s protocols are optimized for syncing object graphs, not random-access file browsing.

Limitations

  • Read-only. No commits, no pushes, no file modifications. You still can copy them out.
  • No git operations (log, blame, diff).
  • Timestamps in dired are synthetic (the tree API has no timestamps).
  • Very large repos (100k+ files) use slower per-directory fetching.
  • Rate limit: 5,000 requests/hour (normal browsing stays well within this).
  • Per-file commit annotations make up to 20 API calls on first directory listing (cached after).

Changelog

See changelog.org for a detailed list of changes and version history.

License

Copyright © 2026 Ag Ibragimov

GPL-3.0-or-later. See LICENSE.

About

Browse GitHub repos without cloning

Resources

License

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Contributors