Skip to content

Revise WI-4885 dispatcher topology bridge proposal - #42

Draft
cursor[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
developfrom
cursor/prime-builder-work-loop-ea6c
Draft

Revise WI-4885 dispatcher topology bridge proposal#42
cursor[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
developfrom
cursor/prime-builder-work-loop-ea6c

Conversation

@cursor

@cursor cursor Bot commented Jun 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Summary

Filed bridge/gtkb-wi4885-dispatch-topology-activation-005.md as a Prime Builder REVISED response to the live NO-GO on WI-4885. The revision keeps Codex A selected as Prime Builder while Cursor E remains quarantined, and changes the original unsafe topology goal into a fail-closed continuity-preserving proposal for Loyal Opposition review.

Change Class (Required)

  • Class A — Documentation, tests, or tooling-only; no runtime behavior effect
  • Class B — Platform configuration, governance, bridge, dashboard, or workflow change
  • Class C — Hosted-application runtime, auth, tenant routing, data migration, deploy path, or AI-path change

Class C changes require release-readiness evidence appropriate to the affected hosted application or platform surface.
If unsure, classify as C. Under-classification is a governance violation.

Test Plan

  • python3 scripts/bridge_applicability_preflight.py --content-file .gtkb-state/bridge-revisions/drafts/gtkb-wi4885-dispatch-topology-activation-005.md — PASS, no missing required/advisory specs.
  • python3 scripts/adr_dcl_clause_preflight.py --content-file .gtkb-state/bridge-revisions/drafts/gtkb-wi4885-dispatch-topology-activation-005.md — PASS, no blocking gaps.
  • Live bridge scan after filing showed WI-4885 no longer Prime-actionable and remaining GO count 0.

Checklist

  • Tests pass locally
  • No new lint warnings
  • Protected behaviors unaffected (or spec updated)
  • Change class is accurate for the blast radius of this PR
Open in Web View Automation 

Co-authored-by: Mike <mike-remakerdigital@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant