fix(spp_graduation): improve code quality, UX, tests, and documentation#96
fix(spp_graduation): improve code quality, UX, tests, and documentation#96gonzalesedwin1123 wants to merge 4 commits into19.0from
Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request significantly enhances the Highlights
Changelog
Activity
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for GitHub and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## 19.0 #96 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 70.39% 70.43% +0.03%
==========================================
Files 674 674
Lines 37005 37031 +26
==========================================
+ Hits 26051 26083 +32
+ Misses 10954 10948 -6
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request significantly enhances the graduation management module by refactoring boolean fields to is_assessment_required and is_approval_required across models, data, and views, and correcting a dependency name. The assessment workflow now includes robust state transition checks with UserError and supports multi-record operations, alongside new validation constraints for scores (0-1) and positive weights. Multi-company support was integrated into GraduationAssessment and GraduationPathway models, leading to simplified security rules. UI/UX improvements include a redesigned assessment form with alert banners and tabbed organization, new Kanban, Graph, and Pivot views for data visualization, and enhanced list view decorations. A dedicated form view for criteria responses was added to manage evidence attachments. Finally, a comprehensive UI testing guide (USAGE.md) was introduced, and extensive unit tests were added or updated to cover the new features, workflow logic, and security rules.
…iews - Add state transition guards with multi-record safety on all action methods - Add score (0-1) and weight (>0) validation constraints - Rename is_requires_assessment/approval to is_assessment_required/approval_required - Restructure assessment form to 4-tab workflow entity pattern (Overview, Criteria Responses, Recommendation, History) - Expose evidence_attachment_ids in criteria response views - Add alert banners, kanban progressbar, graph/pivot views, pathway search view - Fix accessibility (icon titles), list decorations, avatar widget - Remove redundant record rules that duplicated ACLs - Expand test coverage to 40 tests (state guards, constraints, monitoring, security-scoped workflows) - Update DESCRIPTION.md to reflect all changes
…t design - Add readme/USAGE.md with 10 QA test sections covering pathways, assessments, approval workflow, views, search, security, and edge cases - Clarify in DESCRIPTION.md that score and is_met are intentionally independent: score drives weighted readiness, is_met is a qualitative assessor judgment for required criteria checking - Add test 2.3a verifying score/is_met independence in USAGE.md
…n on partner_id
The partner_id field allowed selecting any res.partner (vendors, companies,
internal users) instead of only registrants. Add spp_registry to depends,
add domain=[("is_registrant", "=", True)] on partner_id, update tests to
create registrant partners, add tests for uncovered fields and branches.
…ility Convert #### sub-headings to bold text to avoid RST "skip from level 2 to 5" error when oca-gen-addon-readme generates README.rst.
2df5b90 to
26e39d5
Compare
Summary
Test plan