chore(simulation,statistic): promote to Beta with READMEs and icons#92
Open
chore(simulation,statistic): promote to Beta with READMEs and icons#92
Conversation
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## 19.0 #92 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 71.17% 70.78% -0.39%
==========================================
Files 704 679 -25
Lines 38554 37092 -1462
==========================================
- Hits 27439 26256 -1183
+ Misses 11115 10836 -279
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
emjay0921
force-pushed
the
fix/alpha-to-beta-simulation-statistic
branch
from
9cafb44 to
87fdaad
Compare
emjay0921
force-pushed
the
fix/alpha-to-beta-simulation-statistic
branch
from
1c92580 to
59cebd6
Compare
…ha to Beta with coverage tests - Update development_status to Beta in all 3 manifests - Add READMEs and app icons - Add test_coverage.py for spp_simulation (40 tests) and spp_statistic (48 tests)
Table column widths differ between macOS and Linux docutils. Manually adjusted to match CI-generated output.
…ted DESCRIPTION.md READMEs were generated from the old DESCRIPTION.md content. Updated to match the current DESCRIPTION.md that was merged into 19.0.
emjay0921
force-pushed
the
fix/alpha-to-beta-simulation-statistic
branch
from
05cea6d to
4d905f1
Compare
…cator) Accept 19.0 versions of spp_indicator/tests/__init__.py and spp_indicator/tests/test_coverage.py since spp_statistic was renamed to spp_indicator on the main branch.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Why is this change needed?
Promote
spp_simulation,spp_statistic, andspp_statistic_studiofrom Alpha to Beta after code review confirmed they are clean and production-ready.How was the change implemented?
development_statusfrom"Alpha"to"Beta"inspp_simulationandspp_statisticmanifests"development_status": "Beta"tospp_statistic_studiomanifest (was missing entirely)readme/DESCRIPTION.mdforspp_statisticandspp_statistic_studio(resolvesmissing-readmepylint warnings)README.rstfiles via OCA readme generatoricon.png) for all three modulesNew unit tests
No new tests in this commit — existing test suites already pass:
spp_simulation: 0 failed, 0 errors of 114 testsspp_statistic: 0 failed, 0 errors of 9 testsspp_statistic_studio: UI-only bridge module, no business logicUnit tests executed by the author
All tests pass cleanly on OpenSPP2 Docker environment.
How to test manually
Related links