Analyze project design for user feedback

[N2-N]

Implement interactive retry and edit functionality for generated commit messages to improve user experience.

This PR introduces [y]es / [n]o / [r]etry / [e]dit options after a message is generated, allowing users to regenerate a message or open it in their $EDITOR for manual adjustments. It also includes a cross-platform fix for detecting the default editor.

---

 

[cursor]

Cursor Agent can help with this pull request. Just @cursor in comments and I'll start working on changes in this branch.
_{Learn more about Cursor Agents}

[coderabbitai]

Important

Review skipped

Draft detected.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

✨ Finishing touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment
• Commit unit tests in branch cursor/analyze-project-design-for-user-feedback-claude-4.5-opus-high-thinking-b0bf

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[N2-N]

Closing before the issue #12 history rewrite so this stale draft cannot reintroduce the old artifact history. The branch will be rewritten with the repository.