Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@ildyria has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 23 minutes and 0 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughAdds a new inline Pro badge component, an optional Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 4 (Complex) | ⏱️ ~45 minutes
Poem
Pre-merge checks✅ Passed checks (1 passed)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/components/ui/Pro.astro (1)
1-7: Consider adding TypeScript prop types for better type safety.The component works correctly, but adding an interface for props would improve maintainability and IDE support.
🔎 Optional: Add prop types
--- import { twMerge } from 'tailwind-merge'; +interface Props { + tag?: string; + classes?: string; +} + -const { tag = 'Pro', classes = {} } = Astro.props; +const { tag = 'Pro', classes = '' } = Astro.props; --- <span class={twMerge("rounded-full text-xs text-white bg-amber-600 dark:text-neutral-200 dark:bg-amber-800 px-2 shadow-sm shadow-black/20 ml-2", classes)}><Fragment set:html={tag} /></span>Note: The
classesdefault should likely be an empty string''rather than{}sincetwMergeexpects string arguments. Currently this works becausetwMergecoerces the empty object, but it's not type-safe.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: Organization UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
src/components/ui/Pro.astro(1 hunks)src/components/widgets/FeaturesList.astro(2 hunks)src/pages/get-supporter-edition.astro(6 hunks)src/types.d.ts(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
src/types.d.ts (1)
257-265: LGTM!The
isProoptional boolean property follows the existing pattern of feature flags (isHeader,isV6,isSoon) in theSpecinterface and integrates well with the component usage inFeaturesList.astro.src/components/widgets/FeaturesList.astro (1)
42-49: LGTM!The implementation cleanly extends the feature list to support Pro-specific styling:
- Proper destructuring of
isProfrom specs- Pro badge appended to headers when applicable
- Amber-themed Tick styling for Pro features provides good visual distinction matching the Pro badge color scheme
src/pages/get-supporter-edition.astro (1)
544-579: LGTM!The Pro/Webshop integration section is well-structured:
- Header properly marked with both
isSoonandisProflags- All child features consistently marked with
isPro: true- Availability array
[false, true]correctly indicates these are SE-exclusive features
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
♻️ Duplicate comments (2)
src/pages/get-supporter-edition.astro (2)
599-604: Typos remain unfixed from previous review.The typos "Depending of" → "Depending on" and missing "a" before "few" were flagged in a previous review and still need to be addressed.
651-660: Typos remain unfixed from previous review.The typos "reccords" → "records" and "discord" → "Discord" were flagged in a previous review and still need to be addressed.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: Organization UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/pages/get-supporter-edition.astro(6 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
src/pages/get-supporter-edition.astro (3)
121-121: LGTM!Formatting change removing trailing comma is fine.
543-584: LGTM!The Pro features section is well-structured with consistent use of the
isProflag. The footnote reference (****) correctly links to the explanation in the extra text.
619-622: LGTM!The updated text clearly explains the license key retrieval process.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Documentation
✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.