RELEASE.md: update for the latest workflow - #2060
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Eguzki Astiz Lezaun <eastizle@redhat.com>
|
Warning Review limit reached
More reviews will be available in 20 minutes and 39 seconds. Learn how PR review limits work. Your organization has used up its prepaid credits, and credit purchases are no longer available. Enable the review add-on in the billing tab to keep reviews running — you're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file). ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based credits. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan refill rate. For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses rolling per-developer review limits. Reviews become available again as older review attempts age out of the rolling limit window. Please see our Fair Usage Limits Policy for further information. 📝 WalkthroughWalkthrough
ChangesRelease process documentation update
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In `@RELEASE.md`:
- Around line 79-109: The markdown heading hierarchy in the "Promoting a Release
Candidate to GA" section is incorrect. The parent section uses ## (h2), but the
subsections "Local steps" and "Remote steps" currently use #### (h4). Fix the
heading hierarchy by changing both "#### Local steps" and "#### Remote steps" to
### (h3) to maintain proper nesting structure where each subsection heading
increments by exactly one level from its parent.
- Around line 168-169: The documentation link in RELEASE.md on line 168 points
to an incorrect file path. Update the link reference from
`/doc/development.md#deploy-kuadrant-operator-using-olm` to
`/doc/overviews/development.md#deploy-kuadrant-operator-using-olm` to correctly
point to the development.md file located in the overviews subdirectory where the
"Deploy kuadrant operator using OLM" section exists.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
Signed-off-by: Eguzki Astiz Lezaun <eastizle@redhat.com>
Boomatang
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looks good to me.
It will need a rework when Kuadrant/architecture#178 is implemented, but that is for a different day.
Summary by CodeRabbit