Support for previously defined LD_LIBRARY_PATH in AppImage runner#539
Open
fronald wants to merge 1 commit intoCrealityOfficial:masterfrom
Open
Support for previously defined LD_LIBRARY_PATH in AppImage runner#539fronald wants to merge 1 commit intoCrealityOfficial:masterfrom
fronald wants to merge 1 commit intoCrealityOfficial:masterfrom
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
The launcher (AppRun script) of the Linux AppImage was ignoring the existence of the pre-defined environment variable LD_LIBRARY_PATH. For example, on Fedora 43, the library libbz2.so.1.0 is not available, resulting in the error "error while loading shared libraries: libbz2.so.1.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory", which can be easily fixed by creating a link to the library and setting the LD_LIBRARY_PATH variable. However, the AppImage is overwriting the variable.
Screenshots/Recordings/Graphs
2026-02-26.13-55-02.mp4
Tests
The effectiveness has already been demonstrated in the video above.