chore(deps): bump rust from cfbb0e0 to 6d220bf in /docker/postgres - #11
Conversation
Bumps rust from `cfbb0e0` to `6d220bf`. --- updated-dependencies: - dependency-name: rust dependency-version: 1.97-slim-bookworm dependency-type: direct:production ... Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
dependabot
Bot
added
dependencies
![opencode-agent[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1549082?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
OpenCode could not approve from deterministic current-head evidence because GitHub Checks have failed.
Findings
1. HIGH Current-head GitHub Checks - Fix failed required checks before approval
- Problem: Failed same-head checks remain for
5e7d54bcc21f201a92b0e763b5871a863589fc1c. - Root cause: The model-unavailable evidence fallback is allowed only when peer GitHub Checks are complete and clean.
- Fix: Read and fix the failed check logs below, then rerun the current-head checks.
- Regression test: Keep the model-unavailable fallback gated on an empty failed-check rollup.
Failed checks:
- SAST Semgrep/Semgrep (multi-language SAST): FAILURE (https://github.com/ContextualWisdomLab/pg-llm-batch/actions/runs/29428667664/job/87397647770)
- Semgrep (multi-language SAST) check run: failure (https://github.com/ContextualWisdomLab/pg-llm-batch/actions/runs/29428667664/job/87397647770)
Changed-File Evidence Map
flowchart LR
PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
Evidence --> S1["Changed file: Dockerfile"]
S1 --> I1["repository behavior"]
I1 --> R1["Review risk: Changed file: Dockerfile"]
R1 --> V1["required checks"]
OpenCode Review Overview
Pull request overviewOpenCode could not approve from deterministic current-head evidence because GitHub Checks have failed. Findings1. HIGH Current-head GitHub Checks - Fix failed required checks before approval
Failed checks:
Changed-File Evidence Mapflowchart LR
PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
Evidence --> S1["Changed file: Dockerfile"]
S1 --> I1["repository behavior"]
I1 --> R1["Review risk: Changed file: Dockerfile"]
R1 --> V1["required checks"]
|
Annotate 15 reviewed Semgrep false positives without weakening the SAST gate. Current head is tree-identical to the exact code snapshot whose Semgrep and Security Scan runs passed; the stale old-head OpenCode review was dismissed after the central coverage workflow was repaired.
Handle null request_counts without crashing and convert malformed JSONL output lines into typed GatewayError failures, with regression tests. The effective diff against current main is limited to batch_api_client.py and its tests; the stale old-head OpenCode infrastructure review was dismissed after the central coverage workflow repair. Fresh current-head security checks were triggered, with repository Actions still queued.
Refresh both builder and runtime python:3.14-slim image digests to d3400aa. The branch was integrated with current main and the effective diff was verified as Dockerfile-only. The stale old-head review referenced Semgrep findings resolved by #16; fresh current-head security workflows were triggered and remained in the repository Actions queue.
|
Warning Review limit reached
Next review available in: 16 minutes Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available. How can I continue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews. How do review limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability. For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window. Please refer docs for additional details. Review details⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (6)
Comment |
Superseded by current head f970cb8. The old REQUEST_CHANGES was caused exclusively by repository-wide Semgrep findings resolved in merged PR #16, not by this immutable Rust image digest update. The branch is refreshed onto current main; compare a4faf27...f970cb8 confirms the effective diff is exactly one rust:1.97-slim-bookworm digest replacement. Fresh current-head checks were triggered.
1 participant
Bumps rust from
cfbb0e0to6d220bf.Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting
@dependabot rebase.Dependabot commands and options
You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:
@dependabot rebasewill rebase this PR@dependabot recreatewill recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it@dependabot show <dependency name> ignore conditionswill show all of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency@dependabot ignore this major versionwill close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)@dependabot ignore this minor versionwill close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)@dependabot ignore this dependencywill close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)