chore(deps): bump python from b877e50 to d3400aa - #10
Conversation
Bumps python from `b877e50` to `d3400aa`. --- updated-dependencies: - dependency-name: python dependency-version: 3.14-slim dependency-type: direct:production ... Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
dependabot
Bot
added
dependencies
|
You are seeing this message because GitHub Code Scanning has recently been set up for this repository, or this pull request contains the workflow file for the Code Scanning tool. What Enabling Code Scanning Means:
For more information about GitHub Code Scanning, check out the documentation. |
![opencode-agent[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1549082?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
OpenCode could not approve from deterministic current-head evidence because GitHub Checks have failed.
Findings
1. HIGH Current-head GitHub Checks - Fix failed required checks before approval
- Problem: Failed same-head checks remain for
20f547b7b47152cad73b2e7fb55df081f3e5ea69. - Root cause: The model-unavailable evidence fallback is allowed only when peer GitHub Checks are complete and clean.
- Fix: Read and fix the failed check logs below, then rerun the current-head checks.
- Regression test: Keep the model-unavailable fallback gated on an empty failed-check rollup.
Failed checks:
- SAST Semgrep/Semgrep (multi-language SAST): FAILURE (https://github.com/ContextualWisdomLab/pg-llm-batch/actions/runs/29428662532/job/87397630722)
- Semgrep (multi-language SAST) check run: failure (https://github.com/ContextualWisdomLab/pg-llm-batch/actions/runs/29428662532/job/87397630722)
Changed-File Evidence Map
flowchart LR
PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
Evidence --> S1["Changed file: Dockerfile"]
S1 --> I1["repository behavior"]
I1 --> R1["Review risk: Changed file: Dockerfile"]
R1 --> V1["required checks"]
OpenCode Review Overview
Pull request overviewOpenCode could not approve from deterministic current-head evidence because GitHub Checks have failed. Findings1. HIGH Current-head GitHub Checks - Fix failed required checks before approval
Failed checks:
Changed-File Evidence Mapflowchart LR
PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
Evidence --> S1["Changed file: Dockerfile"]
S1 --> I1["repository behavior"]
I1 --> R1["Review risk: Changed file: Dockerfile"]
R1 --> V1["required checks"]
|
Annotate 15 reviewed Semgrep false positives without weakening the SAST gate. Current head is tree-identical to the exact code snapshot whose Semgrep and Security Scan runs passed; the stale old-head OpenCode review was dismissed after the central coverage workflow was repaired.
Handle null request_counts without crashing and convert malformed JSONL output lines into typed GatewayError failures, with regression tests. The effective diff against current main is limited to batch_api_client.py and its tests; the stale old-head OpenCode infrastructure review was dismissed after the central coverage workflow repair. Fresh current-head security checks were triggered, with repository Actions still queued.
|
Warning Review limit reached
Next review available in: 18 minutes Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available. How can I continue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews. How do review limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability. For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window. Please refer docs for additional details. Review details⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (6)
Comment |
Superseded by current head 316677f. The old REQUEST_CHANGES was caused exclusively by the repository-wide Semgrep false positives fixed in merged PR #16, not by this Docker digest update. The branch is now refreshed onto current main; compare 2fbebe7...316677f confirms the effective diff is exactly the two python:3.14-slim digest replacements in Dockerfile. Fresh current-head checks were triggered.
2 participants
Bumps python from
b877e50tod3400aa.Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting
@dependabot rebase.Dependabot commands and options
You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:
@dependabot rebasewill rebase this PR@dependabot recreatewill recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it@dependabot show <dependency name> ignore conditionswill show all of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency@dependabot ignore this major versionwill close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)@dependabot ignore this minor versionwill close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)@dependabot ignore this dependencywill close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)