⚡ Bolt: 대용량 파일 업로드 처리를 위한 청크 사이즈 최적화 (8KB -> 1MB)#364
Conversation
…erhead Increased the chunk size for `await file.read()` in `src/newsdom_api/main.py` from 8KB to 1MB. When handling large file uploads (e.g., 20MB PDFs) in FastAPI, the default 8KB chunk size results in thousands of asynchronous loop iterations and background thread dispatches (due to `SpooledTemporaryFile` mechanics). Increasing this to 1MB drastically reduces the event loop overhead and significantly improves file I/O latency while keeping memory usage strictly bounded per request.
|
👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request. When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down. I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job! For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs. For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task. |
…erhead Increased the chunk size for `await file.read()` in `src/newsdom_api/main.py` from 8KB to 1MB. When handling large file uploads (e.g., 20MB PDFs) in FastAPI, the default 8KB chunk size results in thousands of asynchronous loop iterations and background thread dispatches (due to `SpooledTemporaryFile` mechanics). Increasing this to 1MB drastically reduces the event loop overhead and significantly improves file I/O latency while keeping memory usage strictly bounded per request.
…erhead Increased the chunk size for `await file.read()` in `src/newsdom_api/main.py` from 8KB to 1MB. When handling large file uploads (e.g., 20MB PDFs) in FastAPI, the default 8KB chunk size results in thousands of asynchronous loop iterations and background thread dispatches (due to `SpooledTemporaryFile` mechanics). Increasing this to 1MB drastically reduces the event loop overhead and significantly improves file I/O latency while keeping memory usage strictly bounded per request.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
OpenCode cannot approve yet because required coverage evidence did not pass.
Review outcome
1. HIGH .github/workflows/opencode-review.yml:1 - Coverage evidence did not prove required test/docstring evidence
-
Problem: The required coverage-evidence job result was
failure, so OpenCode cannot establish approval sufficiency for this head. -
Root cause: Automated approval is only valid when the same-head coverage-evidence job proves supported repository test suites passed and configured docstring gates passed or were advisory, or reports not applicable because no supported source files or package manifests exist. Missing, failed, skipped, unavailable, or unsupported-tooling test evidence is a blocker.
-
Fix: Install or configure the repository test/docstring evidence tooling when source files or package manifests exist, rerun the current-head coverage-evidence job, and approve only after it reports
successwith required evidence or explicit no-source not-applicable evidence. -
Regression test: Keep the approval branch checking
needs.coverage-evidence.result == successbefore posting APPROVE, and publish REQUEST_CHANGES when coverage-evidence blocker states such as cancelled, skipped, failed, unsupported-tooling, or below-100 evidence are present. -
Result: REQUEST_CHANGES
-
Reason: coverage-evidence result was
failure, so required test/docstring evidence was not proven for current head9212325dad3ae1e04bcc558a6decd87b05764e54. -
Head SHA:
9212325dad3ae1e04bcc558a6decd87b05764e54 -
Workflow run: 29622644161
-
Workflow attempt: 1
Coverage evidence
Coverage Decision
- Result: FAIL
- Test evidence: not proven passing
- Docstring evidence: not proven passing when configured
- Failure count: 1
Changed-File Evidence Map
flowchart LR
PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
Evidence --> S1["Changed file (2 files)"]
S1 --> I1["repository behavior"]
I1 --> R1["Review risk: Changed file (2 files)"]
R1 --> V1["required checks"]
OpenCode Review Overview
Pull request overviewOpenCode cannot approve yet because required coverage evidence did not pass. Review outcome1. HIGH .github/workflows/opencode-review.yml:1 - Coverage evidence did not prove required test/docstring evidence
Coverage evidenceCoverage Decision
Changed-File Evidence Mapflowchart LR
PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
Evidence --> S1["Changed file (2 files)"]
S1 --> I1["repository behavior"]
I1 --> R1["Review risk: Changed file (2 files)"]
R1 --> V1["required checks"]
|
💡 구현 내용 (What)
src/newsdom_api/main.py의parse엔드포인트 내 파일 업로드 읽기 청크 크기를8192바이트(8KB)에서1024 * 1024바이트(1MB)로 증가시켰습니다..jules/bolt.md에 추가하였습니다.🎯 해결하는 문제 (Why)
SpooledTemporaryFile을 통해 디스크에 파일을 쓸 때, 작은 청크 단위의 잦은await호출은 불필요한 스레드 컨텍스트 스위칭과 높은 CPU 오버헤드를 유발하여 전체 업로드 처리 속도를 저하시킵니다.📊 성능/영향 (Impact)
🔬 측정/검증 방법 (Measurement)
uv run pytest명령어를 통해 기존 테스트 스위트가 모두 통과하는지 확인하여 기능적 퇴행이 없음을 검증했습니다 (브랜치 커버리지 100% 유지).PR created automatically by Jules for task 7070056487112503834 started by @seonghobae