๐จ Palette: ๋ฒค์น๋งํฌ ๋ฆฌํฌํธ ์ถ๋ ฅ ๋ฐ ์ ๊ทผ์ฑ(UX) ํฅ์#161
๐จ Palette: ๋ฒค์น๋งํฌ ๋ฆฌํฌํธ ์ถ๋ ฅ ๋ฐ ์ ๊ทผ์ฑ(UX) ํฅ์#161seonghobae wants to merge 3 commits into
Conversation
* ๐ก What: `scripts/build_benchmark_report.py`์ ์์ฑ๋ HTML ๋ฆฌํฌํธ CSS์ `@media (prefers-reduced-motion: reduce)` ๋ฐ `@media print` ์ฟผ๋ฆฌ๋ฅผ ์ถ๊ฐํ์ต๋๋ค. * ๐ฏ Why: - (์ ๊ทผ์ฑ) ๋ชจ์ ๊ฐ์ ์ค์ ์ ํ์ฑํํ ์ฌ์ฉ์์๊ฒ ๋ถ๋๋ฌ์ด ์ ํ ํจ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ๋นํ์ฑํํ์ฌ ์น ์ ๊ทผ์ฑ ์ง์นจ์ ์ค์ํฉ๋๋ค. - (UX) ๋ฐ์ดํฐ ์๊ฐํ๊ฐ ํฌํจ๋ ์ ์ ๋ฆฌํฌํธ๋ฅผ ์ถ๋ ฅํ๊ฑฐ๋ PDF๋ก ์ ์ฅํ ๋, ๋ฐฐ๊ฒฝ ์์์ด ๋๋ฝ๋๊ฑฐ๋ ์์๊ฐ ์๋ฆฌ๋ ๋ฌธ์ ๋ฅผ ๋ฐฉ์งํ์ฌ ํ์ง์ ๋ณด์ฅํฉ๋๋ค. * โฟ Accessibility: `prefers-reduced-motion: reduce` ์ง์์ ํตํ ์๊ฐ์ ํธ์ํจ ์ ๊ณต.
|
๐ Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request. When you start a review, I'll add a ๐ emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down. I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job! For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs. For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
OpenCode cannot approve yet because required coverage evidence did not pass.
Review outcome
1. HIGH .github/workflows/opencode-review.yml:1 - Coverage evidence did not prove required test/docstring evidence
-
Problem: The required coverage-evidence job result was
failure, so OpenCode cannot establish approval sufficiency for this head. -
Root cause: Automated approval is only valid when the same-head coverage-evidence job proves supported repository test suites passed and configured docstring gates passed or were advisory, or reports not applicable because no supported source files or package manifests exist. Missing, failed, skipped, unavailable, or unsupported-tooling test evidence is a blocker.
-
Fix: Install or configure the repository test/docstring evidence tooling when source files or package manifests exist, rerun the current-head coverage-evidence job, and approve only after it reports
successwith required evidence or explicit no-source not-applicable evidence. -
Regression test: Keep the approval branch checking
needs.coverage-evidence.result == successbefore posting APPROVE, and publish REQUEST_CHANGES when coverage-evidence blocker states such as cancelled, skipped, failed, unsupported-tooling, or below-100 evidence are present. -
Result: REQUEST_CHANGES
-
Reason: coverage-evidence result was
failure, so required test/docstring evidence was not proven for current head154a6290102a7d64097f990c9570ffa86883f4a7. -
Head SHA:
154a6290102a7d64097f990c9570ffa86883f4a7 -
Workflow run: 29313965791
-
Workflow attempt: 1
Coverage evidence
Coverage Decision
- Result: FAIL
- Test evidence: not proven passing
- Docstring evidence: not proven passing when configured
- Failure count: 1
Changed-File Evidence Map
flowchart LR
PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
Evidence --> S1["Changed file: build_benchmark_report.py"]
S1 --> I1["repository behavior"]
I1 --> R1["Review risk: Changed file: build_benchmark_report.py"]
R1 --> V1["required checks"]
OpenCode Review Overview
Pull request overviewOpenCode cannot approve yet because required coverage evidence did not pass. Review outcome1. HIGH .github/workflows/opencode-review.yml:1 - Coverage evidence did not prove required test/docstring evidence
Coverage evidenceCoverage Decision
Changed-File Evidence Mapflowchart LR
PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
Evidence --> S1["Changed file: build_benchmark_report.py"]
S1 --> I1["repository behavior"]
I1 --> R1["Review risk: Changed file: build_benchmark_report.py"]
R1 --> V1["required checks"]
|
* ๐ก What: `scripts/build_benchmark_report.py`์ ์์ฑ๋ HTML ๋ฆฌํฌํธ CSS์ `@media (prefers-reduced-motion: reduce)` ๋ฐ `@media print` ์ฟผ๋ฆฌ๋ฅผ ์ถ๊ฐํ์ต๋๋ค. * ๐ฏ Why: - (์ ๊ทผ์ฑ) ๋ชจ์ ๊ฐ์ ์ค์ ์ ํ์ฑํํ ์ฌ์ฉ์์๊ฒ ๋ถ๋๋ฌ์ด ์ ํ ํจ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ๋นํ์ฑํํ์ฌ ์น ์ ๊ทผ์ฑ ์ง์นจ์ ์ค์ํฉ๋๋ค. - (UX) ๋ฐ์ดํฐ ์๊ฐํ๊ฐ ํฌํจ๋ ์ ์ ๋ฆฌํฌํธ๋ฅผ ์ถ๋ ฅํ๊ฑฐ๋ PDF๋ก ์ ์ฅํ ๋, ๋ฐฐ๊ฒฝ ์์์ด ๋๋ฝ๋๊ฑฐ๋ ์์๊ฐ ์๋ฆฌ๋ ๋ฌธ์ ๋ฅผ ๋ฐฉ์งํ์ฌ ํ์ง์ ๋ณด์ฅํฉ๋๋ค. * โฟ Accessibility: `prefers-reduced-motion: reduce` ์ง์์ ํตํ ์๊ฐ์ ํธ์ํจ ์ ๊ณต.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
OpenCode cannot approve yet because required coverage evidence did not pass.
Review outcome
1. HIGH .github/workflows/opencode-review.yml:1 - Coverage evidence did not prove required test/docstring evidence
-
Problem: The required coverage-evidence job result was
failure, so OpenCode cannot establish approval sufficiency for this head. -
Root cause: Automated approval is only valid when the same-head coverage-evidence job proves supported repository test suites passed and configured docstring gates passed or were advisory, or reports not applicable because no supported source files or package manifests exist. Missing, failed, skipped, unavailable, or unsupported-tooling test evidence is a blocker.
-
Fix: Install or configure the repository test/docstring evidence tooling when source files or package manifests exist, rerun the current-head coverage-evidence job, and approve only after it reports
successwith required evidence or explicit no-source not-applicable evidence. -
Regression test: Keep the approval branch checking
needs.coverage-evidence.result == successbefore posting APPROVE, and publish REQUEST_CHANGES when coverage-evidence blocker states such as cancelled, skipped, failed, unsupported-tooling, or below-100 evidence are present. -
Result: REQUEST_CHANGES
-
Reason: coverage-evidence result was
failure, so required test/docstring evidence was not proven for current head79782bd2d0b4f527f1e4d7fceb602d5dc1f33fd9. -
Head SHA:
79782bd2d0b4f527f1e4d7fceb602d5dc1f33fd9 -
Workflow run: 29314419747
-
Workflow attempt: 1
Coverage evidence
Coverage Decision
- Result: FAIL
- Test evidence: not proven passing
- Docstring evidence: not proven passing when configured
- Failure count: 1
Changed-File Evidence Map
flowchart LR
PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
Evidence --> S1["Changed file: build_benchmark_report.py"]
S1 --> I1["repository behavior"]
I1 --> R1["Review risk: Changed file: build_benchmark_report.py"]
R1 --> V1["required checks"]
* ๐ก What: `scripts/build_benchmark_report.py`์ ์์ฑ๋ HTML ๋ฆฌํฌํธ CSS์ `@media (prefers-reduced-motion: reduce)` ๋ฐ `@media print` ์ฟผ๋ฆฌ๋ฅผ ์ถ๊ฐํ์ต๋๋ค. * ๐ฏ Why: - (์ ๊ทผ์ฑ) ๋ชจ์ ๊ฐ์ ์ค์ ์ ํ์ฑํํ ์ฌ์ฉ์์๊ฒ ๋ถ๋๋ฌ์ด ์ ํ ํจ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ๋นํ์ฑํํ์ฌ ์น ์ ๊ทผ์ฑ ์ง์นจ์ ์ค์ํฉ๋๋ค. - (UX) ๋ฐ์ดํฐ ์๊ฐํ๊ฐ ํฌํจ๋ ์ ์ ๋ฆฌํฌํธ๋ฅผ ์ถ๋ ฅํ๊ฑฐ๋ PDF๋ก ์ ์ฅํ ๋, ๋ฐฐ๊ฒฝ ์์์ด ๋๋ฝ๋๊ฑฐ๋ ์์๊ฐ ์๋ฆฌ๋ ๋ฌธ์ ๋ฅผ ๋ฐฉ์งํ์ฌ ํ์ง์ ๋ณด์ฅํฉ๋๋ค. * โฟ Accessibility: `prefers-reduced-motion: reduce` ์ง์์ ํตํ ์๊ฐ์ ํธ์ํจ ์ ๊ณต.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
OpenCode cannot approve yet because required coverage evidence did not pass.
Review outcome
1. HIGH .github/workflows/opencode-review.yml:1 - Coverage evidence did not prove required test/docstring evidence
-
Problem: The required coverage-evidence job result was
failure, so OpenCode cannot establish approval sufficiency for this head. -
Root cause: Automated approval is only valid when the same-head coverage-evidence job proves supported repository test suites passed and configured docstring gates passed or were advisory, or reports not applicable because no supported source files or package manifests exist. Missing, failed, skipped, unavailable, or unsupported-tooling test evidence is a blocker.
-
Fix: Install or configure the repository test/docstring evidence tooling when source files or package manifests exist, rerun the current-head coverage-evidence job, and approve only after it reports
successwith required evidence or explicit no-source not-applicable evidence. -
Regression test: Keep the approval branch checking
needs.coverage-evidence.result == successbefore posting APPROVE, and publish REQUEST_CHANGES when coverage-evidence blocker states such as cancelled, skipped, failed, unsupported-tooling, or below-100 evidence are present. -
Result: REQUEST_CHANGES
-
Reason: coverage-evidence result was
failure, so required test/docstring evidence was not proven for current headab30195b8f1f840571cd1c499988513a9cc12dc3. -
Head SHA:
ab30195b8f1f840571cd1c499988513a9cc12dc3 -
Workflow run: 29316049237
-
Workflow attempt: 1
Coverage evidence
Coverage Decision
- Result: FAIL
- Test evidence: not proven passing
- Docstring evidence: not proven passing when configured
- Failure count: 1
Changed-File Evidence Map
flowchart LR
PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
Evidence --> S1["Changed file: build_benchmark_report.py"]
S1 --> I1["repository behavior"]
I1 --> R1["Review risk: Changed file: build_benchmark_report.py"]
R1 --> V1["required checks"]
๐ก What
scripts/build_benchmark_report.py๋ฅผ ํตํด ์์ฑ๋๋ HTML ๋ฒค์น๋งํฌ ๋ฆฌํฌํธ์ CSS์ ๋ค์ ํญ๋ชฉ์ ์ถ๊ฐํ์ต๋๋ค.prefers-reduced-motion)์ ์กด์คํ์ฌ ์ ๋๋ฉ์ด์ ๋ฐ ์ ํ ํจ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ์ต์ํํฉ๋๋ค.@media print)๋ฅผ ํตํด ๋ฆฌํฌํธ๋ฅผ ์ข ์ด์ ์ถ๋ ฅํ๊ฑฐ๋ PDF๋ก ์ ์ฅํ ๋ ์์์ด ์ ํํ ๋ ๋๋ง๋๊ฒ ํ๊ณ (print-color-adjust), ํ ์ด๋ธ ๋ฐ ์นด๋์ ํ์ด์ง ๋๊น ํ์์ ๋ฐฉ์ง(break-inside: avoid)ํฉ๋๋ค.๐ฏ Why
โฟ Accessibility
prefers-reduced-motion: reduce์์ฑ์ ์ถ๊ฐํ์ฌ ์ ๊ทผ์ฑ์ ๊ฐ์ ํ์ต๋๋ค.PR created automatically by Jules for task 9513238136836944240 started by @seonghobae