Multi-threaded reductions #549
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
lshaw8317
reviewed
Jan 20, 2026
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This adds support for multi-threaded reductions. Only some scenarios are supported:
non-strided partitionsin-memory arraysFor now, windows is disabled in combination with miniexpr. This could be improved (@lshaw8317, would you like to tackle this?).
When these conditions are not met, a fallback to existing, non-threaded machinery, is made.
In addition, support for multi-threaded evaluation of expressions (e.g. "(a + b) * c +1") is here too.
All tests are passing now
, but more review needs to be done, as this is quite intrusive for the computing engine.