The wfdesc spec for http://purl.org/wf4ever/wfdesc#Process states that
It is out of scope for wfdesc to classify or specify the nature of the process, this should be done by subclassing and additional subproperties
Is there an example of how this is envisioned to look? I'm surprised there are only input and output properties defined but nothing about the process itself. Which ontologies should be used to further specify Process? For example, I would like to express the command that was run and its arguments.
The
wfdescspec for http://purl.org/wf4ever/wfdesc#Process states thatIs there an example of how this is envisioned to look? I'm surprised there are only input and output properties defined but nothing about the process itself. Which ontologies should be used to further specify
Process? For example, I would like to express the command that was run and its arguments.