34. **`reasoning_effort` / `budget_tokens` not surfaced on OpenAI-compat path** — dogfooded 2026-04-09. Users asking for "reasoning effort parity with opencode" are hitting a structural gap: `MessageRequest` in `rust/crates/api/src/types.rs` has no `reasoning_effort` or `budget_tokens` field, and `build_chat_completion_request` in `openai_compat.rs` does not inject either into the request body. This means passing `--thinking` or equivalent to an OpenAI-compat reasoning model (e.g. `o4-mini`, `deepseek-r1`, any model that accepts `reasoning_effort`) silently drops the field — the model runs without the requested effort level, and the user gets no warning. **Contrast with Anthropic path:** `anthropic.rs` already maps `thinking` config into `anthropic.thinking.budget_tokens` in the request body. **Fix shape:** (a) Add optional `reasoning_effort: Option<String>` field to `MessageRequest`; (b) In `build_chat_completion_request`, if `reasoning_effort` is `Some`, emit `"reasoning_effort": value` in the JSON body; (c) In the CLI, wire `--thinking low/medium/high` or equivalent to populate the field when the resolved provider is `ProviderKind::OpenAi`; (d) Add unit test asserting `reasoning_effort` appears in the request body when set. **Source:** live user questions in #claw-code 2026-04-08/09 (dan_theman369 asking for "same flow as opencode for reasoning effort"; gaebal-gajae confirmed gap at `1491453913100976339`). Companion gap to #33 on the OpenAI-compat path.
0 commit comments