Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Hey, since a few versions it is possible to protect a ClusterOutput. This feature is great when dealing with a multi-tenancy environment.
Describe the solution you'd like
It would be even more interesting to have a possibility on using matchLabels and using matchExpressions for “granting access” to a ClusterOutput. The matcher should be part of the ClusterOutput CRD for controlling access by e.g. specifying a namespace pattern (external-product, internal-product, ...).
Describe alternatives you've considered
Deploy a ClusterFlow instead of a Flow but that feels against the systems 😅
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Hey, since a few versions it is possible to protect a
ClusterOutput. This feature is great when dealing with a multi-tenancy environment.Describe the solution you'd like
It would be even more interesting to have a possibility on using
matchLabelsand usingmatchExpressionsfor “granting access” to aClusterOutput. The matcher should be part of theClusterOutputCRD for controlling access by e.g. specifying a namespace pattern (external-product,internal-product, ...).Describe alternatives you've considered
Deploy a
ClusterFlowinstead of aFlowbut that feels against the systems 😅