As an FYI for others running hake code:
Age-0 NASC can show up in the transect NASC report as hake NASC unless
"Age-0 Hake": "^(?:h0a(?![a-z]|m))",
is added to the REGION_NAME_EXPR_DICT
Once this is set, the age-0 hake are defined appropriately and don't show up in the transect NASC. Any age-0 associated trawls would probably not be in the stratification, so it is unlikely that not having this line in the workflow this would have any appreciable affect on the biomass estimate. However, if the transect NASC report is used for plotting or other analyses, erroneous NASC would show up.
Also, this region name dictionary is definited in the workflow, not in EchoPop, so not having this line is not a bug per se. I am adding this as an issue just as an FYI for folks.
RT
As an FYI for others running hake code:
Age-0 NASC can show up in the transect NASC report as hake NASC unless
"Age-0 Hake": "^(?:h0a(?![a-z]|m))",
is added to the REGION_NAME_EXPR_DICT
Once this is set, the age-0 hake are defined appropriately and don't show up in the transect NASC. Any age-0 associated trawls would probably not be in the stratification, so it is unlikely that not having this line in the workflow this would have any appreciable affect on the biomass estimate. However, if the transect NASC report is used for plotting or other analyses, erroneous NASC would show up.
Also, this region name dictionary is definited in the workflow, not in EchoPop, so not having this line is not a bug per se. I am adding this as an issue just as an FYI for folks.
RT