Describe the New Feature
In a Discussions, it was found by a user that MET's S1 statistic provided slightly different values (i.e. greater) than the WMO-defined S1 statistic. This is due to MET's method of real-world, spatial derivatives for the forecast values in the x and y directions. This involves including the physical distance between gridpoints, which can change by projection and latitude.
In contrast, the WMO-defined method ignores the physical distance and sticks to a grid space distance (1 grid space in each direction).
Users wishing to verify data in accordance with WMO methods should be able to rely on METplus for these calculations, so it is advised to create a new S1 statistic matching the WMO method. This would be in the CNT line type, as it is ignorant of real-world distance between grid spacing.
Acceptance Testing
It would be worthwhile to get Xiaoxi's input on the final result, as they found this issue (Github name @wuxx66)
Time Estimate
Estimate the amount of work required here.
Issues should represent approximately 1 to 3 days of work.
Sub-Issues
Consider breaking the new feature down into sub-issues.
Relevant Deadlines
List relevant project deadlines here or state NONE.
Funding Source
Define the source of funding and account keys here or state NONE.
Define the Metadata
Assignee
Labels
Milestone and Projects
Define Related Issue(s)
Consider the impact to the other METplus components.
New Feature Checklist
See the METplus Workflow for details.
Describe the New Feature
In a Discussions, it was found by a user that MET's S1 statistic provided slightly different values (i.e. greater) than the WMO-defined S1 statistic. This is due to MET's method of real-world, spatial derivatives for the forecast values in the x and y directions. This involves including the physical distance between gridpoints, which can change by projection and latitude.
In contrast, the WMO-defined method ignores the physical distance and sticks to a grid space distance (1 grid space in each direction).
Users wishing to verify data in accordance with WMO methods should be able to rely on METplus for these calculations, so it is advised to create a new S1 statistic matching the WMO method. This would be in the CNT line type, as it is ignorant of real-world distance between grid spacing.
Acceptance Testing
It would be worthwhile to get Xiaoxi's input on the final result, as they found this issue (Github name @wuxx66)
Time Estimate
Estimate the amount of work required here.
Issues should represent approximately 1 to 3 days of work.
Sub-Issues
Consider breaking the new feature down into sub-issues.
Relevant Deadlines
List relevant project deadlines here or state NONE.
Funding Source
Define the source of funding and account keys here or state NONE.
Define the Metadata
Assignee
Labels
Milestone and Projects
Define Related Issue(s)
Consider the impact to the other METplus components.
New Feature Checklist
See the METplus Workflow for details.
Branch name:
feature_<Issue Number>_<Description>Pull request:
feature <Issue Number> <Description>Select: Reviewer(s) and Development issue
Select: Milestone as the next official version
Select: MET-X.Y Development project for development toward the next coordinated release