Discrepancy between resourceType overall percentage and actual resourceType(General) percentages #22
Description
The ResourceType overall percentage is showing 100% here, but it is only populated at 43% for resourceType and resourceTypeGeneral.
Possible explanation:
In this case, 100% might be indicating the presence of the "types" attribute, which probably will be 100% for most slices of metadata because of the way it's generated. Not sure where we might want to go with that. It might be more suitable for it to indicate the coverage of resourceTypeGeneral, but that's not quite the same thing as having the resourceType field populated in XML.