Thank you for APIGen-MT's valuable contribution to the open-source community!
I noticed that the paper mentions 5k open-source data, but it doesn't specify the actual amount of data used during training. Could you please clarify how much data was actually used when training the xLAM-2-fc-r model?
I'm curious about this because understanding the scale of training data would help the community better understand the model's capabilities and potentially reproduce similar results.
Thanks in advance!
Thank you for APIGen-MT's valuable contribution to the open-source community!
I noticed that the paper mentions 5k open-source data, but it doesn't specify the actual amount of data used during training. Could you please clarify how much data was actually used when training the xLAM-2-fc-r model?
I'm curious about this because understanding the scale of training data would help the community better understand the model's capabilities and potentially reproduce similar results.
Thanks in advance!