We have several functions in data-raw and R folders that use an argument inputPathSpecies or equivalent that reads in an rds file that should be identical to ecodata::species_groupings. The rds file has "drifted" away from the ecodata object slightly. There is no need to have this additional file being read in when we can just use the ecodata object. I recommend after the 2026 cycle we update the following indicator workflows
Note: Recent changes in ecodata::species_groupings involve fixing incorrect values in the Jurisdiction field
We have several functions in
data-rawandRfolders that use an argumentinputPathSpeciesor equivalent that reads in an rds file that should be identical toecodata::species_groupings. The rds file has "drifted" away from the ecodata object slightly. There is no need to have this additional file being read in when we can just use the ecodata object. I recommend after the 2026 cycle we update the following indicator workflowsaggregate_biomassbennetcomdatconditionmass_inshore_surveyspecies_distproductivity_anomalyNote: Recent changes in
ecodata::species_groupingsinvolve fixing incorrect values in theJurisdictionfield