-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Expand file tree
/
Copy pathmethods-cc.html
More file actions
1742 lines (1620 loc) · 93.3 KB
/
methods-cc.html
File metadata and controls
1742 lines (1620 loc) · 93.3 KB
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
860
861
862
863
864
865
866
867
868
869
870
871
872
873
874
875
876
877
878
879
880
881
882
883
884
885
886
887
888
889
890
891
892
893
894
895
896
897
898
899
900
901
902
903
904
905
906
907
908
909
910
911
912
913
914
915
916
917
918
919
920
921
922
923
924
925
926
927
928
929
930
931
932
933
934
935
936
937
938
939
940
941
942
943
944
945
946
947
948
949
950
951
952
953
954
955
956
957
958
959
960
961
962
963
964
965
966
967
968
969
970
971
972
973
974
975
976
977
978
979
980
981
982
983
984
985
986
987
988
989
990
991
992
993
994
995
996
997
998
999
1000
<!DOCTYPE html>
<!-- Version 4.0 - Enhanced methodology coverage and improved scoring algorithm based on comprehensive research methods framework. Extended by Claude Code -->
<html lang="en">
<head>
<meta charset="UTF-8">
<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0">
<title>Research Methodology Decision Tree - DBA Program (Enhanced)</title>
<style>
/* Version 4.0 - Enhanced methodology coverage and improved scoring algorithm */
/* Purdue Color Palette */
:root {
--campus-gold: #C28E0E;
--athletic-gold: #CEB888;
--purdue-black: #000000;
--gray: #9D968D;
--dark-gray: #373A36;
--white: #FFFFFF;
}
* {
margin: 0;
padding: 0;
box-sizing: border-box;
}
body {
font-family: Arial, sans-serif;
line-height: 1.6;
background-color: var(--white);
color: var(--purdue-black);
padding: 20px;
}
.container {
max-width: 960px;
margin: 0 auto;
background-color: var(--white);
border-radius: 8px;
box-shadow: 0 2px 10px rgba(0,0,0,0.1);
}
.header {
background-color: var(--purdue-black);
color: var(--white);
padding: 30px;
text-align: center;
border-radius: 8px 8px 0 0;
}
.header h1 {
font-size: 2rem;
margin-bottom: 10px;
}
.header p {
font-size: 1.1rem;
opacity: 0.9;
}
.content {
padding: 30px;
}
.progress-bar {
background-color: var(--gray);
height: 6px;
border-radius: 3px;
margin-bottom: 30px;
overflow: hidden;
}
.progress-fill {
background-color: var(--campus-gold);
height: 100%;
width: 0%;
transition: width 0.3s ease;
}
.question-card {
background-color: var(--white);
border: 2px solid var(--athletic-gold);
border-radius: 8px;
padding: 25px;
margin-bottom: 20px;
display: none;
}
.question-card.active {
display: block;
animation: fadeIn 0.3s ease;
}
@keyframes fadeIn {
from { opacity: 0; transform: translateY(20px); }
to { opacity: 1; transform: translateY(0); }
}
.question-card h2 {
color: var(--purdue-black);
margin-bottom: 15px;
font-size: 1.5rem;
}
.question-card p {
color: var(--dark-gray);
margin-bottom: 20px;
font-size: 1rem;
}
.options {
display: flex;
flex-direction: column;
gap: 10px;
}
.option-button {
background-color: var(--white);
border: 2px solid var(--gray);
color: var(--purdue-black);
padding: 15px 20px;
text-align: left;
cursor: pointer;
border-radius: 5px;
font-size: 1rem;
transition: all 0.3s ease;
}
.option-button:hover {
background-color: var(--athletic-gold);
border-color: var(--campus-gold);
color: var(--purdue-black);
}
.option-button:focus {
outline: 3px solid var(--campus-gold);
outline-offset: 2px;
}
.choice-hint {
display: block;
font-size: 0.9rem;
color: var(--dark-gray);
margin-top: 6px;
}
.result-card {
background-color: var(--athletic-gold);
border: 2px solid var(--campus-gold);
border-radius: 8px;
padding: 30px;
margin-bottom: 20px;
display: none;
}
.result-card.active {
display: block;
animation: fadeIn 0.5s ease;
}
.result-card h2 {
color: var(--purdue-black);
margin-bottom: 20px;
font-size: 2rem;
}
.methodology-details {
background-color: var(--white);
border-radius: 5px;
padding: 20px;
margin: 20px 0;
}
.methodology-details h3 {
color: var(--campus-gold);
margin-bottom: 12px;
font-size: 1.3rem;
}
.methodology-details ul {
margin-left: 20px;
color: var(--dark-gray);
}
.methodology-details li {
margin-bottom: 8px;
}
.method-summary {
margin-bottom: 20px;
}
.method-summary ul {
list-style-type: disc;
}
.warning-card {
background-color: #f8f1df;
border-left: 4px solid var(--campus-gold);
padding: 15px;
margin: 15px 0;
}
.warning-card h3 {
color: var(--purdue-black);
margin-bottom: 10px;
}
.next-steps {
background-color: #f4f5f6;
border-left: 4px solid var(--gray);
padding: 15px;
margin-top: 20px;
}
.path-summary {
background-color: var(--white);
border: 1px solid var(--gray);
border-radius: 5px;
padding: 20px;
margin-bottom: 20px;
}
.path-summary h3 {
color: var(--campus-gold);
margin-bottom: 15px;
}
.path-item {
margin-bottom: 10px;
padding: 8px;
background-color: #f8f9fa;
border-radius: 3px;
border-left: 3px solid var(--athletic-gold);
}
.alternative-card {
background-color: var(--white);
border: 1px solid var(--gray);
border-radius: 6px;
padding: 15px;
margin-bottom: 12px;
}
.alternative-card h3 {
color: var(--campus-gold);
margin-bottom: 8px;
font-size: 1.1rem;
}
.alternative-card ul {
margin-left: 18px;
color: var(--dark-gray);
}
.feasibility-notes {
background-color: #f8f1df;
border-left: 4px solid var(--campus-gold);
padding: 15px;
margin-top: 20px;
}
.examples {
background-color: #f8f9fa;
border-left: 4px solid var(--campus-gold);
padding: 15px;
margin: 15px 0;
}
.examples h4 {
color: var(--purdue-black);
margin-bottom: 10px;
}
.navigation {
display: flex;
justify-content: space-between;
margin-top: 30px;
gap: 15px;
}
.nav-button {
background-color: var(--campus-gold);
color: var(--white);
border: none;
padding: 12px 25px;
border-radius: 5px;
cursor: pointer;
font-size: 1rem;
font-weight: bold;
transition: background-color 0.3s ease;
}
.nav-button:hover {
background-color: #A67309;
}
.nav-button:disabled {
background-color: var(--gray);
cursor: not-allowed;
}
.nav-button:focus {
outline: 3px solid var(--purdue-black);
outline-offset: 2px;
}
.restart-button {
background-color: var(--purdue-black);
color: var(--white);
border: none;
padding: 12px 25px;
border-radius: 5px;
cursor: pointer;
font-size: 1rem;
font-weight: bold;
}
.restart-button:hover {
background-color: var(--dark-gray);
}
.restart-button:focus {
outline: 3px solid var(--campus-gold);
outline-offset: 2px;
}
@media (max-width: 768px) {
.container {
margin: 10px;
}
.content {
padding: 20px;
}
.header {
padding: 20px;
}
.header h1 {
font-size: 1.5rem;
}
.navigation {
flex-direction: column;
}
}
/* Screen reader only content */
.sr-only {
position: absolute;
width: 1px;
height: 1px;
padding: 0;
margin: -1px;
overflow: hidden;
clip: rect(0, 0, 0, 0);
white-space: nowrap;
border: 0;
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
<div class="container">
<header class="header">
<h1>Research Methodology Decision Tree (Enhanced)</h1>
<p>Find the right research approach for your DBA applied research project</p>
</header>
<main class="content">
<div class="progress-bar" role="progressbar" aria-label="Decision tree progress">
<div class="progress-fill" id="progressFill"></div>
</div>
<!-- Question 1: Research Purpose -->
<div class="question-card active" id="question1">
<h2>What is your primary research purpose?</h2>
<p>Choose the core outcome your applied research must deliver for the organization.</p>
<div class="options" role="group" aria-labelledby="question1">
<button class="option-button" data-choice="Explore and understand a business problem or phenomenon" data-value="explore" onclick="handleChoice('question1', this)">
Explore and understand a business problem or phenomenon
<span class="choice-hint">Clarify what is happening and why it matters.</span>
</button>
<button class="option-button" data-choice="Explain relationships between business variables" data-value="explain" onclick="handleChoice('question1', this)">
Explain relationships between business variables
<span class="choice-hint">Test how variables interact and influence outcomes.</span>
</button>
<button class="option-button" data-choice="Predict future outcomes or test interventions" data-value="predict" onclick="handleChoice('question1', this)">
Predict future outcomes or test interventions
<span class="choice-hint">Forecast trends or evaluate how an intervention will perform.</span>
</button>
<button class="option-button" data-choice="Improve or change current business practices" data-value="improve" onclick="handleChoice('question1', this)">
Improve or change current business practices
<span class="choice-hint">Drive change or innovation within the organization.</span>
</button>
<button class="option-button" data-choice="Synthesize existing research evidence" data-value="synthesize" onclick="handleChoice('question1', this)">
Synthesize existing research evidence
<span class="choice-hint">Consolidate and analyze what is already known about the topic.</span>
</button>
</div>
</div>
<!-- Question 2: Level of Control -->
<div class="question-card" id="questionControl">
<h2>Can you manipulate the key variable and (ideally) randomize?</h2>
<p>Be realistic about the control you have over treatments, assignments, or processes.</p>
<div class="options" role="group" aria-labelledby="questionControl">
<button class="option-button" data-choice="Yes, random assignment to conditions is feasible" data-value="randomized" onclick="handleChoice('questionControl', this)">
Yes, random assignment to conditions is feasible
<span class="choice-hint">You can manipulate the intervention and assign participants randomly.</span>
</button>
<button class="option-button" data-choice="I can manipulate but not randomize assignment" data-value="manipulate" onclick="handleChoice('questionControl', this)">
I can manipulate but not randomize assignment
<span class="choice-hint">You control the change but must rely on natural or convenience groups.</span>
</button>
<button class="option-button" data-choice="No manipulation feasible – observational only" data-value="observational" onclick="handleChoice('questionControl', this)">
No manipulation feasible – observational only
<span class="choice-hint">You must observe existing practices without imposing change.</span>
</button>
</div>
</div>
<!-- Question 3: Time Design -->
<div class="question-card" id="questionTime">
<h2>Will you observe change over time?</h2>
<p>Select the time horizon that best matches your data collection or archival records.</p>
<div class="options" role="group" aria-labelledby="questionTime">
<button class="option-button" data-choice="Cross-sectional snapshot" data-value="cross_sectional" onclick="handleChoice('questionTime', this)">
Cross-sectional snapshot
<span class="choice-hint">One point in time – useful for benchmarking or diagnosing.</span>
</button>
<button class="option-button" data-choice="Longitudinal panel or growth over time" data-value="longitudinal" onclick="handleChoice('questionTime', this)">
Longitudinal panel or growth over time
<span class="choice-hint">Track the same units across multiple time points.</span>
</button>
<button class="option-button" data-choice="High-frequency time-series or forecasting" data-value="time_series" onclick="handleChoice('questionTime', this)">
High-frequency time-series or forecasting
<span class="choice-hint">Many observations ordered in time for trend/seasonality analysis.</span>
</button>
</div>
</div>
<!-- Question 4: Data Source -->
<div class="question-card" id="questionData">
<h2>What is your primary data source?</h2>
<p>Match the method to the data you can realistically obtain.</p>
<div class="options" role="group" aria-labelledby="questionData">
<button class="option-button" data-choice="Existing organizational or archival data" data-value="archival" onclick="handleChoice('questionData', this)">
Existing organizational or archival data
<span class="choice-hint">Enterprise systems, transactions, dashboards, or public records.</span>
</button>
<button class="option-button" data-choice="New survey data" data-value="survey" onclick="handleChoice('questionData', this)">
New survey data
<span class="choice-hint">You can reach enough respondents with validated measures.</span>
</button>
<button class="option-button" data-choice="Interviews, observations, or documents" data-value="qualitative" onclick="handleChoice('questionData', this)">
Interviews, observations, or documents
<span class="choice-hint">You need rich accounts from participants or organizational artifacts.</span>
</button>
<button class="option-button" data-choice="Combination of quantitative and qualitative sources" data-value="mixed_source" onclick="handleChoice('questionData', this)">
Combination of quantitative and qualitative sources
<span class="choice-hint">You can integrate numbers with stories for a fuller picture.</span>
</button>
<button class="option-button" data-choice="Published research and evidence" data-value="literature" onclick="handleChoice('questionData', this)">
Published research and evidence
<span class="choice-hint">Systematic review of existing studies and meta-analysis.</span>
</button>
</div>
</div>
<!-- Question 5: Depth vs. Generalizability -->
<div class="question-card" id="questionDepth">
<h2>Is your priority depth in context or generalizable estimates?</h2>
<p>This trade-off guides whether you need immersive understanding, broad evidence, or both.</p>
<div class="options" role="group" aria-labelledby="questionDepth">
<button class="option-button" data-choice="Contextual depth" data-value="depth" onclick="handleChoice('questionDepth', this)">
Contextual depth
<span class="choice-hint">You must understand lived experiences and organizational culture.</span>
</button>
<button class="option-button" data-choice="Generalizable estimates" data-value="generalizable" onclick="handleChoice('questionDepth', this)">
Generalizable estimates
<span class="choice-hint">You need findings that scale across units or populations.</span>
</button>
<button class="option-button" data-choice="Both depth and generalizability" data-value="both" onclick="handleChoice('questionDepth', this)">
Both depth and generalizability
<span class="choice-hint">You want integrated evidence that satisfies multiple stakeholders.</span>
</button>
</div>
</div>
<!-- Question 6: Innovation vs. Evaluation (conditional) -->
<div class="question-card" id="questionInnovation">
<h2>What kind of improvement work are you driving?</h2>
<p>Clarify whether you are building something new, co-creating change, or evaluating an existing process.</p>
<div class="options" role="group" aria-labelledby="questionInnovation">
<button class="option-button" data-choice="Build and evaluate a new artifact or process" data-value="design" onclick="handleChoice('questionInnovation', this)">
Build and evaluate a new artifact or process
<span class="choice-hint">Prototype and test a tool, workflow, or analytics solution.</span>
</button>
<button class="option-button" data-choice="Iterative co-change with stakeholders" data-value="collaborative" onclick="handleChoice('questionInnovation', this)">
Iterative co-change with stakeholders
<span class="choice-hint">Facilitate cycles of planning, action, and reflection with practitioners.</span>
</button>
<button class="option-button" data-choice="Evaluate an existing intervention or process" data-value="evaluate" onclick="handleChoice('questionInnovation', this)">
Evaluate an existing intervention or process
<span class="choice-hint">Assess outcomes of a change already in motion.</span>
</button>
</div>
</div>
<!-- Question 7: Theoretical Maturity -->
<div class="question-card" id="questionTheory">
<h2>How mature is the theory base in this area?</h2>
<p>Determine whether you are extending established theory or need to build new insights.</p>
<div class="options" role="group" aria-labelledby="questionTheory">
<button class="option-button" data-choice="Thin theory – need to build or refine frameworks" data-value="thin" onclick="handleChoice('questionTheory', this)">
Thin theory – need to build or refine frameworks
<span class="choice-hint">Limited prior research or conflicting explanations.</span>
</button>
<button class="option-button" data-choice="Mature theory – ready to test or extend" data-value="mature" onclick="handleChoice('questionTheory', this)">
Mature theory – ready to test or extend
<span class="choice-hint">Robust constructs and prior models exist for validation.</span>
</button>
</div>
</div>
<!-- Question 8: Feasibility Safeguards -->
<div class="question-card" id="questionFeasibility">
<h2>What feasibility guardrails apply?</h2>
<p>Balance ambition with realities like ethics, access, sample size, and timeline.</p>
<div class="options" role="group" aria-labelledby="questionFeasibility">
<button class="option-button" data-choice="Strong support – resources, access, and approvals are in place" data-value="strong_support" onclick="handleChoice('questionFeasibility', this)">
Strong support – resources, access, and approvals are in place
<span class="choice-hint">You can execute complex designs without major constraints.</span>
</button>
<button class="option-button" data-choice="Some constraints – need to streamline scope or sequencing" data-value="moderate_constraints" onclick="handleChoice('questionFeasibility', this)">
Some constraints – need to streamline scope or sequencing
<span class="choice-hint">Watch sample size, stakeholder time, or integration workload.</span>
</button>
<button class="option-button" data-choice="Significant constraints – prioritize a lean, feasible design" data-value="significant_constraints" onclick="handleChoice('questionFeasibility', this)">
Significant constraints – prioritize a lean, feasible design
<span class="choice-hint">Access, ethics, or timeline pressures limit complex approaches.</span>
</button>
</div>
</div>
<!-- Results Section -->
<div class="result-card" id="results">
<div class="path-summary">
<h3>Your Decision Path</h3>
<div id="pathSummary"></div>
</div>
<h2>Recommended Methodology</h2>
<p id="recommendedMethod" aria-live="polite"></p>
<div class="methodology-details">
<div id="methodologyContent"></div>
</div>
<div class="examples">
<h4>Business Research Examples:</h4>
<div id="exampleContent"></div>
</div>
<div class="methodology-details" id="alternativeSection">
<h3>Complementary Alternatives</h3>
<div id="alternativeContent"></div>
</div>
<div class="feasibility-notes" id="feasibilityNotes" style="display:none;"></div>
</div>
<div class="navigation">
<button class="nav-button" id="backButton" onclick="previousQuestion()" disabled>
← Back
</button>
<button class="restart-button" onclick="restart()">
Start Over
</button>
</div>
</main>
</div>
<script>
const baseSequence = ['question1', 'questionControl', 'questionTime', 'questionData', 'questionDepth', 'questionInnovation', 'questionTheory', 'questionFeasibility'];
let decisions = [];
const methodologies = {
'experimental_design': {
name: 'Experimental Research Design',
description: 'Systematic testing of business interventions through controlled manipulation of variables to establish causal relationships.',
when: 'When you must demonstrate that a specific business intervention causes measurable outcomes under controlled conditions.',
methods: [
'True experiments with random assignment to treatment and control groups',
'Randomized controlled trials in organizational settings',
'Field experiments conducted in natural business environments',
'A/B or multivariate testing of business processes or interventions',
'Pre-post comparisons with strong control of alternative explanations'
],
advantages: [
'Strongest evidence for causal relationships',
'Clear measurement of intervention effects',
'Reduces alternative explanations for outcomes',
'Highly credible evidence for business stakeholders',
'Enables precise measurement of business impact'
],
considerations: [
'Randomization and control must be feasible and ethical',
'Requires sufficient sample size per condition',
'Organizational disruption may occur during manipulation',
'Need to manage threats to internal and external validity',
'IRB/ethics approvals and stakeholder alignment are critical'
],
examples: [
'Testing impact of flexible work arrangements on employee productivity',
'Comparing different customer service training approaches on satisfaction scores',
'Evaluating effectiveness of leadership development programs on team performance',
'Experimenting with incentive structures to influence sales performance'
],
nextSteps: [
'Confirm randomization logistics, control conditions, and blinding where possible',
'Secure ethical approvals and stakeholder agreements before manipulating processes',
'Conduct a power analysis to verify minimum sample size per group',
'Document protocols to ensure treatment fidelity and consistent delivery',
'Plan post-test follow-up to monitor sustained impact and unintended effects'
]
},
'quasi_experimental': {
name: 'Quasi-Experimental Design',
description: 'Evaluation of interventions when random assignment is not possible, using comparison groups, matching, or interrupted time-series.',
when: 'When you implement or evaluate business changes with limited control over assignment but can build credible comparison logic.',
methods: [
'Nonequivalent group designs with pre/post measures',
'Propensity score matching with archival or survey data',
'Regression discontinuity or cutoff-based assignment',
'Interrupted time-series with a clear intervention point',
'Difference-in-differences across comparable business units'
],
advantages: [
'Practical for real-world organizational settings',
'Allows evaluation of existing programs or policies',
'Supports causal inference when true experiments are infeasible',
'Leverages naturally occurring groups or timelines',
'Flexible analytical techniques for business data'
],
considerations: [
'Requires careful design to address selection bias',
'Comparison groups must be justified and well-documented',
'Data quality and availability drive analytic rigor',
'Need sufficient observations before and after interventions',
'Results may be sensitive to uncontrolled confounders'
],
examples: [
'Evaluating performance of stores adopting a new merchandising strategy',
'Assessing the impact of a policy change rolled out to select departments',
'Measuring productivity changes after technology adoption without randomization',
'Analyzing customer churn before and after loyalty program updates'
],
nextSteps: [
'Identify and justify a credible comparison group or series',
'Collect consistent pre- and post-intervention data for all groups',
'Document potential confounders and plan analytic controls',
'Engage stakeholders early to secure access to operational metrics',
'Plan sensitivity analyses to test robustness of findings'
]
},
'correlational_observational': {
name: 'Correlational / Observational Study',
description: 'Cross-sectional analysis of naturally occurring variables to understand associations and patterns.',
when: 'When you need to understand relationships among business variables without manipulating conditions.',
methods: [
'Cross-sectional surveys with validated scales',
'Archival data analysis of organizational KPIs',
'Correlation and regression modeling',
'Cluster or factor analysis to uncover patterns',
'Comparative analyses across business units or segments'
],
advantages: [
'Low intrusion into business operations',
'Efficient for diagnosing patterns and drivers',
'Can handle large samples for robust estimates',
'Foundation for future predictive or causal work',
'Useful when randomization is not possible'
],
considerations: [
'Cannot establish definitive causality',
'Requires high-quality measurement and sampling',
'Potential confounds must be acknowledged',
'Relies on statistical controls and model assumptions',
'Generalization limited to similar contexts'
],
examples: [
'Linking leadership behaviors with employee engagement scores',
'Identifying drivers of sales performance across territories',
'Exploring relationships between culture metrics and turnover',
'Mapping connections between process adherence and quality outcomes'
],
nextSteps: [
'Select validated measures aligned to constructs of interest',
'Plan a sampling frame that supports external validity',
'Check for multicollinearity and statistical assumptions',
'Communicate limitations about causal inference to stakeholders',
'Identify follow-up analyses for unexpected correlations'
]
},
'longitudinal_panel': {
name: 'Longitudinal Panel / Growth Modeling',
description: 'Tracking the same participants or units across multiple time points to analyze change and development.',
when: 'When you need to understand how business outcomes evolve over time within the same people, teams, or locations.',
methods: [
'Repeated measures surveys or assessments',
'Latent growth modeling or hierarchical linear modeling',
'Panel data regression with fixed/random effects',
'Cohort-sequential designs capturing multiple entry points',
'Experience sampling or diary studies for shorter cycles'
],
advantages: [
'Captures trajectories and change processes',
'Controls for unobserved individual differences',
'Supports forecasting of future states',
'Identifies timing and sequencing of effects',
'Valuable for retention, development, and policy evaluation'
],
considerations: [
'Requires commitment to multiple data waves',
'Attrition management is critical',
'Complex analysis and data management demands',
'Need consistent measurement across waves',
'IRB/ethics oversight for extended participant contact'
],
examples: [
'Tracking leadership competency growth over a development program',
'Monitoring engagement levels through an organizational change',
'Following customer loyalty metrics across product lifecycles',
'Assessing competency adoption for new technology rollouts'
],
nextSteps: [
'Plan measurement schedule and retention strategies early',
'Ensure consistent instrumentation and data collection procedures',
'Pre-register analysis models for growth or change detection',
'Secure resources for longitudinal data management',
'Communicate interim findings to maintain stakeholder support'
]
},
'time_series_forecasting': {
name: 'Time-Series / Forecasting Analysis',
description: 'High-frequency quantitative analysis leveraging sequential data to detect patterns, cycles, and forecast future performance.',
when: 'When historical organizational or market data are available at regular intervals and future projection accuracy matters.',
methods: [
'ARIMA, ARIMAX, or SARIMA forecasting models',
'Exponential smoothing and state-space models',
'Machine learning forecasting (prophet, gradient boosting, LSTM)',
'Control charts and anomaly detection for operations',
'Causal impact analysis using Bayesian structural time-series'
],
advantages: [
'Optimizes decisions requiring accurate projections',
'Highlights seasonality, trends, and structural breaks',
'Supports scenario planning and resource allocation',
'Leverages existing data assets without new collection',
'Quantifies intervention impacts in temporal context'
],
considerations: [
'Requires sufficient historical depth and stability',
'External shocks or missing data complicate modeling',
'Model selection and validation demand technical expertise',
'May need integration with causal explanations for stakeholders',
'Data governance and security for sensitive time-series'
],
examples: [
'Forecasting call center volume to optimize staffing',
'Projecting revenue impacts of marketing campaigns',
'Detecting anomalies in supply chain performance metrics',
'Predicting demand for new product launches using leading indicators'
],
nextSteps: [
'Audit data quality, stationarity, and seasonality patterns',
'Partition data for training, validation, and holdout testing',
'Engage analytics partners for advanced modeling if needed',
'Visualize forecasts with confidence intervals for decision makers',
'Plan for monitoring model drift and recalibration'
]
},
'sem_modeling': {
name: 'Structural Equation Modeling (SEM)',
description: 'Integrated measurement and structural modeling to test theoretical frameworks with latent constructs.',
when: 'When you need to validate measurement models and analyze complex relationships among latent variables.',
methods: [
'Confirmatory factor analysis for measurement validation',
'Full structural models testing direct and indirect effects',
'Mediation and moderation analysis within SEM frameworks',
'Multi-group SEM to compare across segments',
'Partial least squares (PLS-SEM) for predictive emphasis'
],
advantages: [
'Simultaneously tests measurement quality and structural paths',
'Handles complex causal chains and latent constructs',
'Provides rigorous tests of theoretical frameworks',
'Supports model comparison and refinement',
'High credibility for theory-driven DBA research'
],
considerations: [
'Requires large sample sizes and high-quality survey data',
'Model identification and fit demand technical expertise',
'Assumptions about normality and linearity must be checked',
'Interpretation must align with theory and business logic',
'Software (AMOS, Mplus, LISREL, SmartPLS) proficiency needed'
],
examples: [
'Testing how leadership behaviors influence performance via engagement',
'Examining mediators of customer loyalty in service industries',
'Evaluating competing theoretical models of innovation adoption',
'Assessing culture, climate, and performance linkages in organizations'
],
nextSteps: [
'Confirm instrument reliability and validity with pilot data',
'Map theoretical model specifying hypothesized paths',
'Assess sample size adequacy for model complexity',
'Plan for alternative models if initial fit is inadequate',
'Document decisions about estimation methods and fit indices'
]
},
'survey_research': {
name: 'Survey Research Methodology',
description: 'Systematic collection of standardized data from targeted populations to identify patterns, relationships, and stakeholder perspectives.',
when: 'When you need to measure relationships between variables across broad populations or capture stakeholder perspectives at scale.',
methods: [
'Online surveys for cost-effectiveness and broad reach',
'Mixed-mode approaches (online, phone, mail) for higher response rates',
'Structured questionnaires with validated scales',
'Longitudinal surveys to track changes over time',
'Cross-sectional surveys for population snapshots'
],
advantages: [
'Efficient data collection from dispersed populations',
'Supports statistical testing of relationships',
'Findings can generalize to larger populations',
'Cost-effective for large sample sizes',
'Enables benchmarking across groups'
],
considerations: [
'Requires adequate sample size and response rate management',
'May miss important contextual nuances',
'Risk of response bias and common method variance',
'Instrument design must align with theory and practice',
'Need to balance comprehensiveness with respondent burden'
],
examples: [
'Employee engagement surveys across multiple departments',
'Customer satisfaction benchmarking across regions',
'Assessing readiness for organizational change initiatives',
'Measuring adoption of new business processes at scale'
],
nextSteps: [
'Secure or adapt validated scales aligned with constructs',
'Plan sampling strategy and incentives to reach target response',
'Pilot test to refine wording and estimate timing',
'Develop analysis plan for reliability, validity, and hypotheses',
'Coordinate administration logistics and follow-up reminders'
]
},
'mixed_methods': {
name: 'Mixed Methods Research',
description: 'Strategic combination of quantitative and qualitative approaches to provide comprehensive understanding of complex business phenomena.',
when: 'When you need both statistical evidence and deep contextual understanding, or when one method alone is insufficient.',
methods: [
'Convergent parallel: simultaneous quantitative and qualitative data collection',
'Explanatory sequential: quantitative first, then qualitative explanation',
'Exploratory sequential: qualitative exploration, then quantitative testing',
'Embedded designs integrating qualitative insights into trials',
'Transformative frameworks addressing equity and social responsibility'
],
advantages: [
'Comprehensive view combining breadth and depth',
'Validates findings across different data types',
'Addresses limitations of single-method approaches',
'Builds strong evidence for business recommendations',
'Supports stakeholder learning through mixed evidence'
],
considerations: [
'Complex design and analysis requirements',
'Requires expertise in both quantitative and qualitative methods',
'Longer timelines and more resource intensive',
'Integration challenges demand careful planning',
'Need adequate sample sizes for both phases'
],
examples: [
'Survey employee attitudes then interview managers about implementation',
'Analyze performance data and explore cultural factors through ethnography',
'Measure customer satisfaction and conduct focus groups for deeper insights',
'Test intervention effectiveness then study implementation processes'
],
nextSteps: [
'Specify how qualitative and quantitative strands inform each other',
'Sequence data collection with realistic integration milestones',
'Assemble a team with complementary methodological skills',
'Plan joint displays or meta-inferences to weave findings together',
'Check that timeline and IRB plans accommodate both strands'
]
},
'case_study': {
name: 'Case Study Research',
description: 'In-depth investigation of complex business phenomena within their natural organizational contexts using multiple data sources.',
when: 'When you need deep understanding of complex business problems, unique situations, or want to capture context and complexity.',
methods: [
'Multiple data sources: interviews, observations, documents',
'Single case studies for intensive analysis of unique situations',
'Multiple case studies for comparative analysis',
'Embedded case designs examining multiple units within organizations',
'Systematic case study protocols and evidence chains'
],
advantages: [
'Rich, detailed insights into complex business problems',
'Captures context and real-world complexity',
'Flexible data collection methods',
'Good for exceptional performers or innovative practices',
'Generates actionable insights for similar contexts'
],
considerations: [
'Findings may not generalize to other organizations',
'Time-intensive data collection and analysis',
'Potential for researcher bias and subjectivity',
'Requires access to organizational stakeholders',
'Need systematic approaches to enhance credibility'
],
examples: [
'How a company successfully navigated digital transformation',
'Why a merger failed to achieve expected synergies',
'Factors contributing to exceptional organizational performance',
'Implementation challenges in strategic change initiatives'
],
nextSteps: [
'Define case boundaries and selection rationale clearly',
'Negotiate access to people, documents, and observations',
'Develop a protocol to maintain chain of evidence',
'Triangulate data sources to enhance credibility',
'Plan analytic strategy (pattern matching, explanation building)'
]
},
'ethnography': {
name: 'Ethnographic Research',
description: 'Immersive qualitative research capturing lived experiences, culture, and meaning-making within organizations.',
when: 'When understanding organizational culture, rituals, and daily practice is essential to solving the business problem.',
methods: [
'Extended participant observation in the field',
'Shadowing and contextual inquiry',
'Artifact and document analysis',
'Iterative interviewing with key informants',
'Reflexive field notes and analytic memos'
],
advantages: [
'Reveals tacit assumptions and cultural drivers',
'Builds empathy and nuanced understanding',
'Generates grounded insights for change initiatives',
'Supports design of context-sensitive interventions',
'Flexible to emerging discoveries'
],
considerations: [
'Requires significant time in the field',
'Researcher role management (insider/outsider) is critical',
'Data collection and analysis occur simultaneously',
'Ethical considerations for confidentiality and consent',
'Findings focus on transferability rather than generalization'
],
examples: [
'Understanding frontline adoption of new technology',
'Exploring cultural barriers to diversity initiatives',
'Examining informal practices shaping customer experience',
'Documenting how agile teams coordinate in practice'
],
nextSteps: [
'Clarify field entry strategy and researcher role',
'Secure informed consent and address confidentiality needs',
'Develop observation guides while allowing flexibility',
'Maintain reflexive journals to monitor bias and learning',
'Plan member checks or feedback sessions with participants'
]
},
'grounded_theory': {
name: 'Grounded Theory',
description: 'Systematic qualitative methodology for building theory from data when existing explanations are limited.',
when: 'When you need to develop a new conceptual framework or process model grounded in participant experiences.',
methods: [
'Theoretical sampling driven by emerging insights',
'Open, axial, and selective coding procedures',
'Constant comparison across incidents and cases',
'Memo writing to capture theoretical leaps',
'Iterative refinement until theoretical saturation'
],
advantages: [
'Generates fresh theory tailored to business contexts',
'Captures processes and drivers overlooked by existing models',
'Flexible and responsive to emergent findings',
'Strong fit for novel or rapidly changing phenomena',
'Supports creation of practice-informed frameworks'
],
considerations: [
'Requires disciplined coding and memoing routines',